Palad v Tan [2015] NZIACDT 13 (03 March 2015) [pdf, 155 KB]
...refunding the fees and had not personally received the money, she said a third party was responsible. In particular, she said Mr Mehta, who had a role in the practice, should make any payments. Discussion The Tribunal has already cancelled Ms Tan’s licence [11] Ms Tan’s licence has already been cancelled by the Tribunal as a result of a separate complaint (refer NQE v Tan [2013] NZIACDT 46, www.justice.govt.nz). [12] It is not necessary to impose any further period of prohibitio...