Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Nguy [2021] NZLCDT 4 [pdf, 161 KB]
...Northern NSW Australia and have no attachment to these emails.” Although this is only indicative, it fits with the other misleading representations made by the practitioner that settlement was held up by reasons attaching to people or banks offshore. We do not rely on this item but note it fits with the pattern. [17] Although the practitioner asserts that Mr C gave instructions for the various payments to be made, Mr C disputes that. In our assessment, it seems improbable tha...