KV v LA LCRO 44/2015 (13 December 2016) [pdf, 122 KB]
...[2] Mr KV’s son is Z. Z’s mother did not share Mr KV’s view of where their child’s best interests lay. They were unable to resolve disagreements over Z’s care, contact and guardianship. Mr KV instructed Mr LA to act for him. Both parents made applications to the Family Court. The Family Court made a series of orders relating to Z, setting out the basis on which his parents would manage his life over the months that followed, but did not make final orders at that stage...