[2021] NZEnvC 165 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Toanga [pdf, 554 KB]
...following litigation in 2008-2009. In broad terms, the way that arrangement had worked in the past meant that Poutama/Te Ahuru expected that they would be closely involved from the outset in the planning and execution of a project such as this. It is through this active engagement and monitoring of the works that Poutama/Te Ahuru believe their cultural interests can be best protected, and possibly the need for an authority avoided altogether. We were directed to various sources...