Search Results

Search results for phone services.

4033 items matching your search terms

  1. NN v BT [2024] NZDT 155 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 155 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: 1. BT is required to repair NN’s [phone] to restore it to full working order and in particular, is to repair the issue which is causing it to not charge and not power on. BT is also to ensure the charging port is fully operational with all pins in place as they should be (the Repair)...

  2. EMPC Form 2A - Application for leave to extend [doc, 46 KB]

    ...……………………………………………… Signature of applicant Date: Notice to the respondent to application for leave (1) If you intend to oppose the application for leave, you must, - (a) within 14 clear days after the date of the service on you of this notice, file with the Registrar of the Employment Court at [place] a written notice stating that you oppose the application for leave; and (b) without delay, serve 1 copy of the written notice on the applicant. (2) If you fa...

  3. Application for family or civil legal aid form [pdf, 3.6 MB]

    ...details 1 Title Miss Ms Mrs Mr 2 Full name 3 Have you ever used another name? Yes No If yes – list your other names used. 4 Date of birth dd / mm / yyyy 5 Your current address 6 Your postal address (if different from current address) 7 Mobile phone 8 Home phone 9 Work phone 10 Other contact phone Whose number is this? 11 Email Living arrangements 12 Do you have a partner who lives with you? Yes No If yes – partner’s full name: 13 How many children do you have under 18 year...

  4. QM v QU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1673 (11 October 2021) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1673 APPLICANT QM RESPONDENT QU Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QU Ltd is to pay $1,711.08 to QM on or before 31 October 2021. 2. Ownership of the [phone] reverts to QU Ltd. 3. QM is to return the [phone] to QU Ltd immediately at her cost. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 4. On 2 August 2021, QM (using the name KM) purchased an [phone] from QU Ltd (“QU”) for $1,699.00. QM...

  5. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual-Feb-2025.pdf [pdf, 380 KB]

    ............................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative background and decision-makers ........................................................................... 4 The Legal Services Act 2011 and related regulations ................................................................. 4 Legal Services Commissioner .......................................................................................................

  6. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual-updated.pdf [pdf, 302 KB]

    ............................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative background and decision-makers ........................................................................... 4 The Legal Services Act 2011 and related regulations ................................................................. 4 Legal Services Commissioner .......................................................................................................

  7. Legal-Aid-lawyer-Provider-Manual.pdf [pdf, 265 KB]

    ............................................................................................................................. 3 Legislative background and decision-makers ........................................................................... 4 The Legal Services Act 2011 and related regulations ................................................................. 4 Legal Services Commissioner .......................................................................................................

  8. KQ v FH [2022] NZDT 185 (25 October 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

    ...KQ entitled to a refund? Did the bull work on the night of the event and if not, what caused the failure? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 9. I have carefully considered the evidence and I am satisfied that the bull did not provide the service for which it was hired. The staff attempted to get it working and consulted with FH over the phone in an attempt to locate and fix the problem, without any success. 10. I have regard for the fact that FH claims that the problem was...

  9. [2012] NZEmpC 179 Drader v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...started asking her about her face and what had happened and people were coming to have a look or to laugh. She stated to her manager at the 14 February disciplinary meeting: I just went to my desk, pulled up her name, looked into UCVII for her phone number and I went into the little interview room and rung her and threatened her … I said “hi, is this [client A]?” And she said “yep”. I said “you’ve let the dogs out now, you’d better watch out”, and I hung up....

  10. High Court Form G32: Interlocutory application without notice [doc, 40 KB]

    ...stated. Signature: …………………………………… (Solicitor for plaintiff/counsel for plaintiff) Date: Notice to the respondent (1) If you intend to oppose the above application, you must, - (a) within 14 clear days after the date of the service on you of this notice, file with the Registrar of the Employment Court at [place] a written notice stating that you oppose the application; and (b) without delay, serve 1 copy of the written notice on the applicant. (2) If you fail...