Search Results

Search results for privacy.

2759 items matching your search terms

  1. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No.3 (Consolidation Refused) [2017] NZHRRT 48 [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...Miekle HRA Strike-out application HRRT046/17 Public Trust PA Strike-out application [2] It can be seen four of the listed proceedings have been brought under the Human Rights Act 1993 while two of the proceedings have been brought under the Privacy Act 1993. [3] The proceedings in HRRT010/16 were struck out on 2 November 2017. See Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 42. [4] The Privacy Act proceedings in HRRT008/16: Apostolakis v Gilbert were to be heard...

  2. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No.2 (Consolidation Refused) [2017] NZHRRT 47 [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...Miekle HRA Strike-out application HRRT046/17 Public Trust PA Strike-out application [2] It can be seen four of the listed proceedings have been brought under the Human Rights Act 1993 while two of the proceedings have been brought under the Privacy Act 1993. [3] The proceedings in HRRT010/16 were struck out on 2 November 2017. See Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 42. [4] The Privacy Act proceedings in HRRT008/16: Apostolakis v Gilbert were to be heard...

  3. Apostolakis v Attorney-General No.1 (Consolidation Refused) [2017] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...Miekle HRA Strike-out application HRRT046/17 Public Trust PA Strike-out application [2] It can be seen four of the listed proceedings have been brought under the Human Rights Act 1993 while two of the proceedings have been brought under the Privacy Act 1993. [3] The proceedings in HRRT010/16 were struck out on 2 November 2017. See Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 42. [4] The Privacy Act proceedings in HRRT008/16: Apostolakis v Gilbert were to be heard...

  4. C v Accident Compensation Corporation [2020] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 193 KB]

    Reference No. HRRT006/2018 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN C PLAINTIFF AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms MA Roche, Co-Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr C in person Ms S Shaw and Mr S Kinsler for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 9 April 2019 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 19 July and 9 August 2019 (defendant) 1 August 2019 (plaintiff) DATE OF DECISION: 3 Feb...

  5. EMPC - Pro bono assistance service application [pdf, 296 KB]

    ...Service at least 24 hours in advance if you are unable to attend a scheduled appointment. The Service has the right to terminate its provision of assistance to you if you are unable to attend an appointment and provide inadequate notice to us. Privacy 10. The Service agrees to treat your personal information in accordance with its Privacy Policy attached to these terms and conditions. By making an application and receiving assistance from the Service you agree to the terms of the Priv...

  6. LCRO 185/2020 BC v DE and FG decision & minute (20 May 2021 & 30 April 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

    ...Ms BC had concerns about the directions that had been made on 6 May 2020. [12] In early June 2020 Ms BC wrote to Ms DE complaining that the latter had not provided documents to her as required by the procedural directions. She referred to the Privacy Act 1993, and made an information privacy request for release to her of a large number of documents held by RL. [13] Ms BC also asked the ERA to intervene in connection with her information privacy request, but was informed that it d...

  7. The Intersecting Lines - Business interests and personal autonomy [pdf, 335 KB]

    ...applied in practice, has excited a considerable amount of attention overseas. As a Europe-only convention, it does not apply in New Zealand and we have no legislative equivalent. That is not to say that an employee has no legitimate expectation of privacy; or that an employer can mount any incursion it likes into an employee’s life away from work. What does our legal framework say about respecting the boundary line between an individual’s professional and private life, both wit...

  8. Rafiq v Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 83 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 9 Reference No. HRRT 037/2011, 038/2011 & 039/2011 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Dr AD Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr S Cohen-Ronen for Defendant...

  9. OIA 98726 [pdf, 1.9 MB]

    ...overseas disclosures Thank you for your email of 26 August 2022 requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982, information regarding copies of all submissions on the consultation of regulations for overseas disclosures under section 214 of the Privacy Act 2020. Specifically, you requested: I am wn'ting to ask you for a copy of all submissions on the consultation on regulations to be made specifying countries for overseas disclosures under section 214 of the Privacy Act 2020 (...

  10. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 10 Reference No. HRRT 040/2011 & 041/2011 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RAZDAN RAFIQ PLAINTIFF AND CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY OF NEW ZEALAND FIRST DEFENDANT AND DIRECTOR OF CIVIL AVIATION SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, Member Dr AD Trlin, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Rafiq in person (no appearance) Mr E Child an...