2773 items matching your search terms
...contacted each week aiming to achieve approximately 300 finalised interviews (the response rate during the last week of interviewing was 82%). The average length of an interview is about 12 minutes. The survey follows the NZCVS strict approach to privacy and confidentiality and no contact details of interviewed adults are released. June 29, 2020 Sector Group Research and Evaluation Unit
...correspondence in the bundle seems to suggest that the agreed commission split was 75% to Kellands, 25% to Bayleys. [12] The complaints made by the McNabbs were whittled down in this appeal to three matters: (i) The appellant breached the McNabbs’ privacy by forwarding an e-mail on 2 March to Mr Buckley. (ii) That the appellant made disparaging comments about the McNabbs in an e- mail dated 29 March 2010. (iii) The appellant failed to act in the McNabbs’ best interest by...
...expected to have known her conduct was wrong, even if she didn’t know the precise rule, it is fair to say that the misconduct would not have occurred if she had been properly supervised. Her then employer has been dealt with at a modest level in the privacy of a Standards Committee process. [7] The offending blackmail letter was emailed by Ms A from her home email after 1am. That she was working at such an hour probably reflects the social and financial pressures she was under....
...permanent home "in due course". He says that the property has always adjoined rural amenity land and describes the surrounding rural land as "precious". He values the rural activities on this land. He and his family value their privacy.11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 J M Hanan s274 notice; application for waiver by J M Hanan, dated 11 July 2019. D M Hanan s274 notice; application for waiver by D M Hanan, dated 11 July 2019. AR Leighton Barrowclough s274 notice; a...
...within one month. ORDER FOR SUPPRESSION [52] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.12 This requires balancing the public interest in the transparency of the Tribunal with the privacy of individuals. [53] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Ms Nandan’s client, the complainant. [54] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the complainant is to be published other than to Immigrat...
...prescribes that hearings are to be held in public. 5 240 Restrictions on publication (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal is of the opinion that it is proper to do so, having regard to the interest of any person (including (without limitation) the privacy of the complainant (if any)) and to the public interest, it may make any 1 or more of the following orders: (a) an order prohibiting the publication of any report or account of any part of any proceedings before it, whether held in pub...
...went off on a tangent. She expressed objection to the couple’s private information having been shared with the respondent’s lawyers. This exchange developed into a dispute between the applicant and the LCS about the LCS’s compliance with the Privacy Act 2020. [77] The LCS responded explaining the lawyers’ complaints process, including the effect of the consent to information disclosure the applicant had given when making her complaint, and the respondent’s right to legal repr...
...circumstances outlined in cl 44(1) and cl 45(a). The hubodometer is also located on the outside axle hub of the vehicle and the licence is on the windscreen of the vehicle. Consequently, this is less of an intrusion into a person’s expectation of privacy than a power of entry. [5] 28. We have concluded that although these clauses constitute a search under s 21 of the Bill of Rights, for the above reasons the search powers are not “unreasonable”. Right to be presumed innocent 2...
...that any offence is, or will be committed by the person. Right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure - Section 21 26. Section 21 protects the right to be free from unreasonable search or seizure. This protects reasonable expectations of privacy as between individuals and the state. This balance is usually struck by allowing searches only for evidence of serious offending that has already happened or is in progress and where the evidence is believed to be in the place to be se...
...[15] The adviser held a provisional licence, and accordingly was required to comply with section 19(5) of the Act. She was required to work under “direct supervision of a fully licensed immigration adviser”. [16] The adviser failed to sign a privacy waiver (as required under her supervision agreement). [17] The complainant claimed (not necessarily correctly) that supervision is ongoing; however, the Tribunal is dealing only with this complaint. Accordingly, it is sufficient to note t...