Search Results

1. LCRO 130/2022 FN v EO (31 October 2023) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...and only found out that Mr FN had left the firm when she made contact in March. [25] Ms EO also complained about Mr TX who had declined to reduce the fees charged by Mr FN. [26] Ms EO says that from the information received in response to a Privacy Act request, she could only ascertain that the work completed was the preparation and service of the statutory demand. [27] She sought a “fair and reasonable adjustment of the fee”. Mr FN’ response [28] Mr TX responded...

2. E90 Graeme McIndoe - Urban Design - RE – Applicant [pdf, 967 KB]

   ...to this concern regarding prescription, the Final Agreed Version of the Design Requirements now provides a threefold increase from the agreed 6 August Requirements allowing 2627 15 up to 30% of the fence to be solid11. This allows for privacy where required and maintains public views into the yard. 5.18 Furthermore, balanced against this is the potential for the public to view into the yards, with Mr Groeschner in evidence at 2.7 and 2.9 writing of facilitating as much...

3. [2024] NZREADT 01 - CAC 2106 v Pang (8 January 2024) [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...Pang’s submissions are to be filed and served by 20 February 2024. [55] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. PUBLICATION [56] Having regard to the privacy of the vendor and her daughter as well as the interests of the public in the transparency of the Tribunal, it is appropriate to order 15 publication of this decision without identifying the vendor or the vendor’s daughter,...

4. OIA-98262.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...further table (Table 2), which lists information that is not publicly available. Copies of the documents listed in Table 2 are enclosed. Some information has been withheld under the following sections of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect the privacy of natural persons; • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions for the time being which protect the confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers of the Crown and officials; • section 9(2)(g)(i) to maintai...

5. Director of Proceedings v Radius Residential Care Ltd [2015] NZHRRT 50 [pdf, 310 KB]

   ...documentation of ongoing evaluation and dressing changes. These processes will be completed on the Wound Assessment/Care Plan/Evaluation form. All wound care interventions are to be conducted in a manner which protects the clients [sic] right to privacy and dignity. Clients, family/whanau [sic] are to be involved in wound assessment and care planning and interventions are to be acceptable to the client…… Wound care is to be delivered in accordance with this policy and in acc...

6. LCRO 198/2020 CO and EA v LT (29 August 2023) [pdf, 673 KB]

   ...completed. They also say that: … The fact that one of the Agreements we had asked for was simply a copy and paste of another customers Agreement, including their names and conditions specific to them, is not only a breach of confidentially or privacy for those customers but is totally unacceptable to charge on to us. [37] They also consider that the calculations in the Committee’s determination are incorrect. Outcome [38] By way of summary of their supporting reasons for the...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 149 Radius Residential Care Ltd v McLeay [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...incident regarding the Integrated Progress Notes. The thrust of the complaints detailed in the statement of claim in relation to Ms R was that the defendant had breached company policy by failing to obtain full references; that she breached Ms R’s privacy rights by contacting Ms R’s former employer and the police without Ms R’s authorisation; that she proceeded to suspend Ms R in breach of company procedure; that those actions resulted in contact by Ms R’s legal adviser and...

8. [2024] NZIACDT 01 RN v Li (8 Janurary 2024) [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...SUPPRESSION [92] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.19 It must balance the transparency of the Tribunal and the public’s interest in knowing of wrongdoing by advisers, with the privacy of individuals. [93] There is no public interest in knowing the name of the complainant or Mr X. There is a public interest in knowing of the immigration companies/company names used by Mr Li. Disclosure of the name of M...

9. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 66 KB]

   ...intimately related to discrimination. He endorsed the use of the principle of self-identification, and there had long been recognition of the fact that interference in that process could lead to human rights problems, including violations of the right to privacy and expression of identity. He expressed concern about the discrepancy between the information provided by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and that provided by the Government with regard to the situation since the enactment o...

10. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2018] NZLCDT 26 [pdf, 349 KB]

    ...12 [57] Secondly, as to her suggestion that she told health professionals and claims managers that she was working16. [58] There is no need to traverse the medical evidence in any further detail and indeed this accords with the privacy rights of the practitioner. B. Admissions Made to the Insurance Company [59] Counsel for Ms Fendall urges us to treat these admissions with some caution. She submits that at the time of the interview Ms Fendall was still suffering f...