Search Results

1. Improving jury trial timeliness - Discussion document [pdf, 447 KB]

   ...information in your feedback to be released, please state this clearly and explain why. For example, some information may be commercially sensitive or personal. The Ministry will take your views into account when responding to such requests. The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects and uses personal information about you and your submission. You have the right to access and correct personal information. https://consultations.justice.govt.nz/ 5 Part 1: Jury Tri...

2. M v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury) [2024] NZACC 88 [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...Dr Faulkner. [125] Accordingly, M’s appeal is allowed. [126] M is entitled to reimbursement of his costs in the appeal which I am confident the parties can agree. Suppression [127] I consider it necessary and appropriate to protect the privacy of the appellant. I make an order pursuant to s 160(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. This order forbids publication of the name, address, occupation, or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the appellant. As...

3. [2022] NZACC 8 – N v ACC (20 January 2022) [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...further claim. Conclusion [125] Accordingly, the appeal must fail. Decision [126] The appeal is dismissed. [127] There is no issue as to costs. ACR 037-20-N Suppression [128] I consider it is necessary and appropriate to protect the privacy of the appellant. This order, made under s 160(1) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001, forbids publication of the name, address, occupation, or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the appellant. As a result, t...

4. [2022] NZEnvC 086 Smith & Silk v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 6 MB]

   SMITH & SILK v CCC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 86 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s 120 of the Act BETWEEN P SMITH AND C SILK (ENV-2021-CHC-84) Appellants AND CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J E Borthwick – sitting alone under s 279 of the Act In Chambers at Christchurch Date of Consent Order: 25 May 202

5. [2007] NZEmpC AC 13/07 Red Beach School Board of Trustees & Ors v New Zealand Education Institute (Inc) [pdf, 135 KB]

   ...including the particular nature of their disabilities, their behavioural issues and the treatment and care regimes they required. In reaching my decision, I have had careful regard to all of that evidence but, in the interests of maintaining the privacy and dignity of the children and their families, I do not record it in detail in this judgment. I will, however, refer to some characteristics of particular children when I discuss the application of the CEA to the work done by the...

6. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - summary record 4th report [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...listed the main achievements in the field of human rights protection in New Zealand during the current year: the establishment of effective and vigorous national human rights institutions, including primarily the Human Rights Commission, but also the privacy commissioner, the health and disability commissioner, and the commissioner for children; the further development of jurisprudence concerning human rights and matters covered by the BORA; the emergence of a holistic approach to human r...

7. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - accessible [docx, 206 KB]

   ...indicate this clearly and explain why. For example, you may wish for some information to be kept confidential because it is sensitive personal information. The Ministry of Justice will take your views into account when responding to such requests. The Privacy Act 2020 governs how the Ministry collects, holds, uses, and discloses personal information about you and the information you provide. You have the right to access and correct personal information. The Ministry will proactively release a s...

8. [2022] NZEnvC 231 Hurupaki Holdings Limited v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 966 KB]

   ...on-site parking located at least 2m from the adjacent legal road boundary. b) Any boundary treatment such as timber fencing to reduce or minimise noise nuisance on neighbouring residential properties. c) Vegetative screening to minimise visual or privacy effects on adjacent properties. d) Location and design of any outdoor lighting. e) Location and design of any signage (either freestanding or located on the proposed building). 8. Prior to the opening and operation of the café, the con...

9. Stanley & Anor as trustees of the Lucy Stanley Family Trust v North Shore City Council [2011] NZWHT Auckland 20 [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...were made from what was on the consented plans. The plans provided for a railing balustrade to be fitted around the perimeter of the deck. At the request of Ms Stanley this was changed to a solid balustrade to part of the deck to provide some privacy. In addition the gutter detail on sheet 7 of the balcony details showed the gutter being fixed directly over the EIFS cladding. This was contrary to the Rockcote July 1997 brochure and was considered by the experts to be inappropr...

10. [2023] NZREADT 2 - Wilson and Wilson v Registrar of the REAA (26 January 2023) [pdf, 222 KB]

    ...licensee. In particular, the applicants say they should have been provided with the emails between the licensee and the vendors. It is submitted by the Registrar that the applicants’ natural justice rights must be weighed against the countervailing privacy interests of other parties, such as the licensee and vendors. It would also be contrary to the purpose of the Act to require broad disclosure of private and confidential communications in response to complaints such as those...