Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC CC 16/07 Harris v Charter Trucks Ltd [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...information if there is good reason to maintain the confidentiality of the information. (1C) For the purpose of subsection (1B), good reason includes— (a) complying with statutory requirements to maintain confidentiality: (b ) protecting the privacy of natural persons: (c) protecting the commercial position of an employer from being unreasonably prejudiced. [74] Mr Sutherland said that he did not mention anything about the Foodstuffs contract to Mr Harris and Mr Thomp...

2. Proposals against incitement of hatred and discrimination - discussion document - Te Rēo Māori [pdf, 339 KB]

   ...pēnā ai. Hei tauira, ka mate koe kia noho tūmataiti ētahi mōhiohio nā te āhuatanga rahirahi o ērā mōhiohio matawhaiaro. Ka whai whakaaro te Tāhū o te Ture ki ō whakaaro ina uruparengia ana ērā tono. He manawhakahaere hoki tō te Privacy Act 2020 mō tā te Tāhū kohikohi, pupuri, whakamahi, whakaputa hoki i te mōhiohio matawhaiaro e pā ana ki a koe, me ngā mōhiohio ka whakaratongia e koe. He mōtika tōu kia uru, kia whakatika hoki i ngā mōhiohio matawhaiaro. K...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 35 Radford v Chief of New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...Radford being entitled to celebrate 11 public holidays each year corresponding to the Holidays Act 2003. Further, the Code refers to the Employment Relations Act 2000, and other New Zealand statutes including the Official Information Act 1982, the Privacy Act 1993 and the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products Act 1990. [112] Adding to this situation is that the CDF’s protest to the jurisdiction of the Court did not state an intention to argue (in either the USA or New Zea...

4. [2017] NZEnvC 204 City Rail Link Limited Successor to Auckland Transport v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.7 MB]

   ...including the lift tower element, but excluding below-ground foundations, is to be located any closer than 3.5m from the boundary of 5 Porters . Avenue. [120] Condition 47.2(b)(xii)(a) provides that the design of the bridge shall minimise loss of privacy on adjacent residential sites. The most potentially affected existing residential development is at 6 Porters Avenue. A large utilitarian business premise is opposite on the western side of Porters Avenue. We have found nothing in t...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 181 Allied Investments Ltd v Guise [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...trainees to obtain drugs for him. The respondent was informed of the allegations against him and subsequently denied them. He asked for details about the complaint but he was given no further information on the grounds that WINZ imposed strict privacy protection. The respondent was suspended and later dismissed. The Court upheld a finding by the Employment Tribunal that the respondent had been unjustifiably dismissed. Former Chief Judge Goddard held that before taking action to s...

6. LA Provider Manual Part 1 Approvals - December 2018 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Where the Selection Committee makes a recommendation or comes to a resolution, the Chair will sign a written recommendation or resolution that may be released to the applicant. Reference: Regulation 13, and The Official Information Act 1982 and The Privacy Act 1993 Conflicts of interest If a member of the Selection Committee has a conflict of interest, the member must declare the conflict of interest to the Chairperson. If the Chairperson considers that the conflict of interest is lik...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 062 Kombi Properties Limited (formerly HFT Limited) v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...each unit in Blocks A and B, allowing the business operations in the ground floor to function without reliance on the upper residential floor facilities. (g) glazing is proposed to achieve both thermal and glare control, as well as allowing both privacy on the street side and open views on the harbour side for residential occupants. Views out to the harbour would enhance the area by providing an opportunity for passive surveillance of the public esplanade area. [14] The proposal is base...

8. [2020] NZEmpC 73 Waste Management NZ Ltd v Jones [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...His email went on to say that, as the employer, Waste Management was required to provide the information to enable Ms Jones to fully and fairly respond to the allegations that had been made. Mr Shipley was referred to s 4 of the Act, and the Privacy Act 1993, and informed that a failure to satisfy the request would lead to legal action being taken. [108] Mr Thompson’s 2 May email included expanded requests for information. As to the time and wage records, the company was to...

9. LCRO 3/2024 RP v TG (21 May 2024) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...direct such publication of his or her decision as the Review Officer considers necessary or desirable in the public interest. “Public interest” engages issues such as consumer protection, public confidence in legal services and the interests and privacy of individuals. [196] Having had regard to the issues raised by this review, I have concluded that it is desirable in the public interest that this decision be published in a form that does not identify the parties or others involved...

10. National Standards Committee 1 v Gardner-Hopkins [2021] NZLCDT 21 (22 June 2021) [pdf, 360 KB]

    ...say that this evidenced a prolonged and intimate interaction at a level that can fairly be described as only just short of sexual intercourse. [75] The practitioner indicated that he had not wished to detail the conduct out of concern for the privacy of Ms K. The Standards Committee assert that the practitioner’s attempt to minimise the conduct, which he has now accepted was at least at the level of unsatisfactory conduct, was for his own benefit. 17 [76] Mr Gardner-Ho...