Search Results

1. Tamplin v Boizard [2021] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 242 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF MEDICAL REPORTS AND FAMILY COURT DOCUMENTS (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 042/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN ANDREW FRASER KEITH TAMPLIN PLAINTIFF AND ROBERT BOIZARD DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms SJ Eyre, Deputy Chairperson Sir RK Workman KNZM QSO, Member Ms SB Isaacs, Member RE...

2. Boyd v Legacy Church and Legacy Housing (Strike-Out) [2023] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 138 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 026/2020 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN RACHEL BOYD PLAINTIFF AND LEGACY CHURCH FIRST DEFENDANT AND LEGACY HOUSING SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms J Foster, Deputy Chairperson Dr S Hickey, MNZM Member Ms S Isaacs, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr CJ Tennet for plaintiff No appearance for defendants DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 2 February 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CL...

3. Appeal against access direction - reply (s105) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...details. Email Postal address THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL Appeal against access direction - Reply When to use this form Use this form if you are named as a respondent in an appeal against an access direction under section 105 of the Privacy Act 2020 and you wish to file a ‘Reply’ in opposition to the appeal. Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS. Use a black pen or blue pen when completing this form. • Please file four physical copies of this ‘Reply�...

4. Cunliffe & Cunliffe v Helensville Primary School Board of Trustees (Costs) [2024] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 173 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 043/2020 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN REGAN CUNLIFFE FIRST PLAINTIFF AND RACHEL CUNLIFFE SECOND PLAINTIFF AND HELENSVILLE PRIMARY SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms SJ Eyre, Chairperson Mr JS Hancock, Deputy Chairperson Ms L Ashworth, Member Dr NR Swain, Member REPRESENTATION Mr RD Cunliffe and Ms RV Cunliffe in person Mr M Hutcheson and Ms L Wilkinson for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 28 – 29 August 2023...

5. [2022] NZEmpC 80 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community) and any privilege held by, or available to, any person: 2 Prasad v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZEmpC 160 at [4]. 3 Erceg v...

6. Taylor v Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2021] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 139 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 011/2018 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ARTHUR WILLIAM TAYLOR PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr JAG Fountain, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AW Taylor in person Mr D Jones for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 11 January 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM1...

7. OIA-111163.pdf [pdf, 707 KB]

   ...particular any other policies dealing with emerged or emerging AI technologies. Please include the date the policy was introduced and the date the policy is set to be reviewed. • Copies of any written correspondence with the Government Chief Privacy Officer (GCPO) regarding the generative AI policy. Please include copies of any meeting notes or agendas. Please note the dates of any in-person or other verbal conversations which took place and include a summary of the discussion....

8. [2021] NZREADT 55 – Lammas v Real Estate Agents Authority (6 December 2021) [pdf, 340 KB]

   ...was signed and had failed to provide a list of the prospective purchasers when their agency ended. This amounted to unsatisfactory conduct. The Freears were each censured and fined $3,000. The Committee decided to take no further action on the privacy complaint concerning the photograph and a complaint against the agency for failing to properly supervise Ms Freear. [4] The Lammases appeal to the Tribunal against the Committee’s dismissal of the photography and supervision compl...

9. Clarification on the Family Legal Advice Service processes [pdf, 388 KB]

   ...that require clarification or a reminder about the process. Most importantly the providers with the FLAS approval need to remember to:  black out the unique identifier on the copy of their client’s proof of identity - a requirement of the Privacy Act 1993.  sign the Funding Declaration. This is important as it verifies that the provider has viewed their client’s proof of identity and evidence of eligibility for the service. Note that this cannot be delegated to someone...

10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Slater (Adjournment) [2014] NZHRRT 53 [pdf, 48 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2014] NZHRRT 53 Reference No. HRRT 036/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN THE DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND CAMERON JOHN SLATER DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr RK Musuku, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for plaintiff Mr CJ Slater in person DATE OF HEARING: 28 and 29 October 2014 DATE OF MI...