2763 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 54 Reference No. HRRT 008/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KATHY APOSTOLAKIS PLAINTIFF AND PETER GILBERT DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms WV Gilchrist, Member Hon KL Shirley, Member REPRESENTATION: Mrs K Apostolakis in person Mr PC Gilbert in person DATE OF HEARING: 29 November 2017 DATE OF DECISION: 29 Nove...
...or new electronic media. However, it is important to note that civil actions require the aggrieved individual to bring court proceedings and many do not have the means or desire to do so. 7. The civil actions include defamation, invasion of privacy, breach of confidence, breach of copyright and harassment. In addition, while not generally enforceable in the courts, the Privacy Act 1993 and Human Rights Act 1993 offer avenues of redress for certain types of communications. This i...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 6 Reference No. HRRT 035/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RODNEY PHILIP HIDE PLAINTIFF AND OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr RP Hide in person Mr SM Kinsler and Ms SK Shaw for defendant Mr R Jamieson-Smyth and Ms J Foster for Privacy Commissioner DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 22 Reference No. HRRT 030/2009 & 031/2009 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 AND UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE DEFENDANT FOR COSTS BETWEEN TATSUHIKO KOYAMA PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Mr BK Neeson, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr Koyama in person Mr...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 37 Reference No. HRRT 004/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN LAWRENCE WAYNE DEEMING PLAINTIFF AND WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr LW Deeming in person Ms KE Candy for defendant DATE OF HEARING: On the papers DATE OF DECISION: 26 August...
...as the CIBS Act: does not recognise or provide for tikanga Māori or the Crown’s responsibility under the Treaty of Waitangi, despite the regime’s significant impact on the rights and interests of Māori does not adequately protect privacy and human rights even though the regime is intrusive by nature has gaps, resulting in uncertain legal standing has legislative design issues, making it difficult to understand and apply, and does not provide for adequat...
...PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS AND IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF AGGRIEVED PERSON OR HIS STEP-DAUGHTER (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 091/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Ms DL Hart, Member Ms ST Scott QSM, Member REPRESENTATION:...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2022] NZHRRT 6 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 024/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Guo in person assisted by Ms Li Yan (her mother) as McKenzie friend Mr TL Clarke for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers...
...that of “Confidentiality” and provided: … all information revealed by, and discussed with, police staff seen by a Practitioner is treated in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Ethics of the New Zealand Psychologists Board and the Privacy Act 1993. [5] The relevant psychologists’ Code of Ethics of the NZ Psychological Society, the NZ College of Clinical Psychologists and the NZ Psychologists Board provided relevantly as follows. [6] Principle 1.6 (“Privacy and Co...
...operating. The camera has a front-facing screen, so the person they are visiting can see what is being recorded.BWC footage will be held securely within Ministry systems, and access to it will be restricted. Requests for BWC footage will be managed under the Privacy Act 2020 and Official Information Act 1982. The footage will be deleted after 90 days unless the Ministry determines there is a reason to keep it (for example, a complaint investigation or health and safety incident).For more detail...