Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC CC 20/07 O'Flynn v Southland DHB [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...unjustified dismissal. Particulars are only sought in relation to the breach of contract. Materially, the plaintiff pleads that: • He had raised concerns about workplace health. • There were internal deficiencies in the administration of human resources. He was entitled to but did not receive clinical support or accurate and timely information about key risks and problems including about another psychiatrist, Dr Fisher. • The defendant failed to respond to serious underst...

2. 2023-10-12-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-A-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 548 KB]

   ...thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi...

3. [2022] NZEnvC 189 Port Marlborough New Zealand Limited v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE :MA TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 189 of the Resource Management Act 1991 appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act PORT :MARLBOROUGH NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2020-CH C-49) ... (continued on separate page) Appellants :MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan - sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers at...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 079 Maungaharuru-Tangitū Trust v Hastings District Council [pdf, 19 MB]

   MAUNGAHARURU-TANGITŪ TRUST v HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2024] NZEnvC 079 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under clause 14(1) of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MAUNGAHARURU-TANGITŪ TRUST (ENV-2015-WLG-054) Appellant AND HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court:1 Environment Judge L J Semple Environment Commissioner D J Bunting Heari...

5. Burn v CAC 20002 & Anor [2014] NZREADT 25 [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...contract becoming unconditional, the vendor found out that his builder had not obtained the requisite permit for the deck. Rather than there being a simple “sign off”, the builder had to get plans drawn and go through the process of obtaining a resource consent after more work was carried out. [9] The licensee also says that on 3 August 2011, the complainants entrusted him with the sole agency listing for re-sale of the property. The agreed sale price was $948,000, which was $32,0...

6. [2020] NZEmpC 106 Kiteley v Carbine Aginvest Corp Ltd [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...employment was Head of Operations and Business Transformation. It was a senior management position and Mr Kiteley was paid a substantial salary and received significant incentive and performance related bonuses. [2] Tru-Test operated a farm resource management business. Early in 2017 the Board of Tru-Test engaged consultants to review the business. Following this, Tru-Test began a process of splitting the business for the purposes of selling one of the farm resource ma...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 46 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...The ' fractionated c laims' usually have the same basis of claim against the Crown, yet the Tribunal must be sure that they have been adequately researched and must still then hear and report on them. All thi s consumes considerable resources and, in the end, such claims may not even be abl e to be settl ed indi vidually. It is time for everyone to look carcful1y at this process. Possible Solutions How should fractionation be dealt with? One way would be to amend the...

8. ENV-2016-AKL-000239 Colgan v Auckland Council amended appeal [pdf, 879 KB]

   " IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND ENV -2016-AKL- of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 (LGATPA) and the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal under section 156(1) section 156(3) of the LGATPA against a decision of the Auckland Council on a recommendation of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel (Hearings Panel) on the proposed Auckland Unitary...

9. [2019] NZEnvC 035 Taylor v Small [pdf, 269 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC 35 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for enforcement orders pursuant to s 316 of the Act WILLIAM PETER TAYLOR, SUSAN MARY TAYLOR, SCOTT KERRY JACKSON, SARAH ANNE JACKSON, RICHARD DONALD JOHNSTON, RACHEL ELIZABETH JOHNSTON (ENV-2018-AKL-068) Applicants GEOFFREY CLEMMENT SMALL, ARIA SMALL Respondents Court: Environment Ju...

10. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 54 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 353 KB]

    ...North Island claims being given greater priority is that many of the claimants have been willing to consolidate under an umbrella grouping, the Volcanic Interior Plateau (VIP) claim. This is likely to lead to significant efficien- cies in time and resources for both the claimants and the Tribunal, and there is also evidence that other multi-claim groupings are now forming. The Tribunal has indicated that, given the large number of claims involved, the Central North Island will b...