Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 217 Chorus New Zealand Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 415 KB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 217 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN CHORUS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED, SPARK NEW ZEALAND TRADING LIMITED AND VODAFONE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-019) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Chief Environment Court Judge D A Kirkpatrick Last case event: 25 Octobe...

2. YAL final evaluation report July 2021-21 July version [pdf, 569 KB]

   ........................................................................................................................................ 18 ii Challenges ................................................................................................................................. 20 4.5 Immediate impacts on resourcing ................................................................................... 21 4.6 Suggestions for improvement ...............................................

3. Dr Nicholas Tony Shears - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 485 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Auckland Registry ENV 2015 AKL 0000134 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal under Clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN TRUSTEES OF MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST AND Appellant BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent -· STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF DR. NICHOLAS TONY SHEARS ON BEHALF OF MOTITI ROHE MOANA TRUST 25th October 2017 Counsel Acting RB Enright Barrister Level 1, Stan beth House 28 Customs...

4. ENV-2016-CHC-000071 Affidavit of Mr Murray Valentine [pdf, 18 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2016-CHC-000071 Instructing Solicitor: David Wilding Wilding Law POBox 29473 Christchurch Telephone 358 9988 dave@wildinglaw.co.nz INTHEMATIER AND BETWEEN AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for declarations under Part 12 of the Act ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2016-CHC-000071) Applicant MACKENZIE DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AFFIDAVIT OF MURRAY GRAHAM VALENTINE +e. S...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 211 Masterton District Council [pdf, 782 KB]

   RE MASTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision [2023] NZEnvC 211 IN THE MATTER of an application under s 86D of the Resource Management Act 1991 BY MASTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL, CARTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL and SOUTH WAIRARAPA DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2023-WLG-000010) Applicants Court: Environment Judge L J Semple sitting alone under s 279(1) of the Act Hearing: In chambers at Wellington...

6. MacDonald v MacDonald - Wairau Blk.XII Sec. 6C 2C (2014) 27 Te Waipounamu MB 68 (27 TWP 68) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...and improvements of $140,000. Subsequently the applicant provided a letter from the Marlborough District Council dated 17 July 2013 that stated: “Council is of the view that the proposed partition is inconsistent with the current Wairau/Awatere Resource Management Plan due to the new blocks being less than 8 hectares. Furthermore, the rear block would be technically land-locked as there is no guarantee that access will always be available over adjoining land, particularly if that ad...

7. [2012] NZEmpC 39 Imperial Tobacco New Zealand Limited v Pereira [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...his finger at him and verbally assaulted him by saying, “I can see what‟s going on here now” remarking to Mr Chote “this little shit has been in your ear.” [5] Imperial Tobacco‟s factory manager, Mr Mike McInnarney and the human resources manager, Ms Patricia Wylie, proceeded to conduct a disciplinary investigation. After carrying out preliminary interviews they notified Mr Pereira of three additional allegations, apart from the 14 March 2011 incident, and they asked...

8. Regulatory Impact Statement on proposed LINZ fees regulations under the marine and coastal area takutai moana 2011 act [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...coastal area and gives LINZ new responsibilities for processing and determining applications. Prior to the Act’s commencement, most applications for an interest in reclaimed land were processed by the Department of Conservation (DOC) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). 2. Sections 35(5) and 43(2) of the Act require applicants to pay fees for LINZ services to be set in regulations made under section 118(h)(i) of the Act. The fees are payable on application and are recov...

9. LCRO - 2015 annual report [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...LCRO could direct, in appropriate cases, that the review be conducted without need for a personal appearance from the applicant. (3) When concerns about delay in delivering decisions are at the forefront, it is an unproductive use of judicial resource for Review Officers to be diverted by applications which transparently lack merit. A not inconsiderable number of the applications that come before the office present, on initial examination, as having remote chance of achieving success...

10. [2024] NZEnvC 066 Federated Farmers of New Zealand v Waikato District Council [pdf, 362 KB]

    ...Waikato District Council - Topic 20: Miscellaneous IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 066 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2022-AKL-000051) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the...