Search Results

1. [2011] NZEmpC 124 Amien v Reipen and Others interlocutory [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...secure his claim before the Authority for unpaid wages and holiday pay, future loss of earnings, bonuses and compensation for non-economic loss. [6] In his affidavit, the applicant describes Mr Reipen as “a multi millionaire with significant resources at his disposal”. He lists a number of companies of which Mr Reipen is the sole shareholder including Awakino Fortune Ltd which is said to own five properties held in 11 titles with a combined rating valuation of $6,920,000. T...

2. ENVC Matiatia party corresp joint memo WML AT 20150703 [pdf, 719 KB]

   Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter And In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Joint Memorandum on behalf of Waiheke Marinas Ltd and Auckland Transport Dated 3 July 2015 Richard Brabant/Jeremy Brabant Barristers Broker House, Level 2, 14 V...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 222 Selwyn Foundation v Nayathodan re-issued [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...challenge to the Authority’s substantive determination. It says that it is required to lodge its challenge within 28 days after the Authority’s determination was issued, pursuant to s 179(2). [8] Further, the plaintiff says that the time and resources of both parties, their witnesses, and the Authority may be wasted if the Authority proceeds to hear the merits of the defendant’s grievance and determines these, in the event that the Authority’s preliminary determination was...

4. FFNZ - EiC - R J McDiarmid (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 231 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127) Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF RO...

5. LCRO 113/2013 AB v EF (3 August 2017) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it”.5 In this regard he refers to the Wednesbury test for unreasonableness.6 [15] Mr AB is not specific as to his grounds for review, noting that he did “not have the resources currently or the time with recent severe illness to direct the LCRO to individual paragraphs from [his] complaint”.7 [16] His lack of specificity would justify a decision from this Office that is brief. In addition, Mr AB did no...

6. Large v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal) [2022] NZACC 203 [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...Walker [1963] NZLR 339, 353-354 (CA); Edwards v Bairstow [1995] 3 OER 48, 57. [25] Even if the qualifying criteria are made out, the Court has an extensive discretion in the grant or refusal of leave so as to ensure properly use of scares judicial resources. Leave is not to be granted as a matter of course. One factor in the grant of leave is the wider importance of any contended point of law: e.g. Jackson and Kenyon above. [4] An error of law will also arise where a decision is...

7. Team Leader AODTC PD 2023 [doc, 131 KB]

   ...role, and supports good judgment. · Act as an information source for team members, assigning tasks, following up and giving instructions as needed. · Establish and maintain effective relationships with internal and external stakeholders. · Monitor resources to ensure they are available to manage work volumes. · Participates in the recruitment, training and induction of new staff. · Maintain an AODTC file load of around three to six AODTC participants. · Undertake any requisite attendan...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 182 Beresford v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   BUNKER & ROUSE v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 182 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN M J BERESFORD, R T BUNKER & L M ROUSE (ENV-2018-CHC-69) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Judge S Tepania Environ...

9. LD v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs on appeal) [2023] NZACC 45 [pdf, 159 KB]

   ...claimant. In addition the Court is not only ill suited to determining what might be reasonable costs in a particular instance having regard to the economics of private legal practice, but any such attempt would impose a significant burden on judicial resources should every decision on costs require the careful consideration of this Court. [20] In McPhail,3 Henare DCJ stated: [56] Rating this case according to its complexity within categories 1 to 3, I conclude this is not an app...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 169 Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited [pdf, 207 KB]

    Waikato Regional Council v Rawhiti Environmental Park Limited IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2023] NZEnvC 169 IN THE MATTER OF an application pursuant to s 320 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2023-AKL-000139) Applicant AND RAWHITI ENVIRONMENTAL PARK LIMITED Respondent Court: Environment Judge MJL Dickey Hearing: Judicial Telephone Conferences held 8 and 9...