Search Results

1. NE v RL LCRO 88/2013 (27 February 2015) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...the opportunity to hear from both parties on review on the rule 7 issue, and both of them had the opportunity to make submissions at the review hearing. [40] I consider I have sufficient information to make a fair and informed decision. [41] The resources of the Standards Committees and this Office should be used efficiently and effectively. I do not consider a referral back would be an efficient or effective use of the resources of the Standards Committee. [42] Mr NE is willing...

2. ENVC Hearing 27Jul15 WML suppl evidence Robert Pryor [pdf, 430 KB]

   Before the Environment Court at Auckland ENV-2013-AKL-000174 In the Matter And In the Matter of the Resource Management Act 1991 of Notice of Motion under Section 87G requesting the granting of resource consents to Waiheke Marinas Limited to establish a Marina at Matiatia Bay, Waiheke Island, in the Hauraki Gulf Supplementary Statement of Evidence of Robert James Pryor on behalf of Waiheke Marinas Ltd Dated 22 June 2015 Richard Brabant/Jeremy Brabant Barristers Br...

3. TQ v FW LCRO 214/2015 (27 September 2016) [pdf, 64 KB]

   ...1 Evidence of TQ at review hearing. The company was represented by a lawyer in an employment dispute involving allegations of theft against Mr WA. The company subsequently retained the services of XX Services (XX), a human resources consultancy firm. 2 [4] Ms FW is Ms RT’s lawyer in family matters concerning her two children with Mr TQ (the children). [5] Ms FW also acts for Mr WA in an employment dispute that involves Mr TQ. [6] Mr TQ says that M

4. Waitangi Tribunal - Memorandum historical claims [pdf, 642 KB]

   ...of their grievances have been addressed in the respective district inquiry's evidential record of documents and Tribunal report. 38. The nexus between remaining historical claims and previous district inquiries, in particular their evidential resources and the Tribunal's reports on claims with similar issues, opens the door to a fast-track inquiry process. The process will focus on claims with grievances where a nexus can be demonstrated. 39. In outline, under the fast-track p...

5. [2018] NZEnvC 057 Far North Holdings Limited v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 5.5 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT. I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC S l­ of the Biosecurity Act 1993 the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) of an appeal pursuant to s 291 of the RMA FAR NORTH HOLDINGS LIMITED KERIKERI CRUISING CLUB WHANGAREI HARBOUR MARINE MANAGEMENT TRUST WHANGAROA MARINA MANAGEMENT TRUST RIVERSIDE DRIVE MARINA (20...

6. BORA Housing Restructuring and Tenancy Matters (Social Housing Reform) Amendment Bill [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...reference point for a person’s ability to pay, and the provision of social housing may require the Government to draw broad distinctions between groups and make certain assumptions about the characteristics of groups in order to effectively direct resources to where they are most needed. 4. We do not consider the significant search powers provided for under the Bill are inconsistent with ss 14 or 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. The powers are necessary to ensure that social housing con...

7. [2021] NZEnvC 101 Close v Wellington City Council [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA IN THE NIATIER OF BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 101 an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 D GOODWIN, F CLOSE, P OL VER and C HORROCKS (ENV-2020-WLG-000007) Appellants WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent WELLINGTON ZIPLINE ADVENTURES LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge B P Dwyer sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the...

8. Staite v Greenville - Paeroa East 4B2C2 (2002) 264 Rotorua MB 132 (264 ROT 132) [pdf, 711 KB]

   ...take matters into his own hands and to build a bridge on his own land, the new bridge. It was claimed by the respondents, that the work on the bridge by Staite, constituted the replacement of the old bridge and therefore consent pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 C'RMA"), was required. In fact Staite had dealt extensively with the Waikato Valley Authority, which had conceded rightly or wrongly that consent was not needed. He therefore had the ability to proceed....

9. Otimi v Fa'uhiva - Hauhungaroa 1A3 (2019) 401 Aotea MB 102 (401 AOT 102) [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...of these simply repeated earlier submissions, although some included allegations of bias, “bullying” and unfair treatment. The submission of Lavinia Fau’hiva is an example:7 I support the lack of integrity to procedures and inefficient resources used to conduct the voting process resulted in a big mistake being made in the tally up of votes, and that days later we were notified of this mistake and the changes that were made accordingly. The impact this whole debacle [sic] h...

10. [2023] NZEnvC 038 Poutama Kaitiaki Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 318 KB]

    ...Charitable Trust v Heritage New Zealand [2022] NZHC 2713. [23] [24] [25] [26] 7 Basis of strike out application First Gas’s submissions The Environment Court has jurisdiction to make a strike out application under s 279(4) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). First Gas submits that the Poutama Trust have no reasonable case, that the appeal is untenable, and that to allow the appeal would be an abuse of process because the appeal is bound to fail. Specifica...