Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC WC 34/07 Crook v Sovereign Services Ltd [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...these contractual obligations. In particular, an assessment of the foreseeability of harm and its risk must take account of the current state of knowledge and not be made with the benefit of hindsight. Relevant to this assessment is the size and resources of the employer. As Miss Buckett submitted, Sovereign is a large commercial business with a human resources department and is in the business of providing risk assessment to others.

2. [2014] NZEmpC 60 Walker v Firth Industries [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...the site delegate for the New Zealand Amalgamated Engineering, Printing & Manufacturing Union (the union) and had been pursuing this issue for some time. One of the people present at the meeting was Vicki Donaghue, a member of the human resources department of Firth who was based at the Dunedin Plant doing training and staff development work. In the course of the meeting, Ms Donaghue referred to Mr Walker as “my nigger”. This was apparently said in jest but, as a Maori,...

3. Arthur v Accident Compensation Corporation (Vocational Independence) [2023] NZACC 36 [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...certainly hold him in good stead going forward into the workplace when he has recuperated from his injuries. Eoin has therefore successfully completed his computer training that it typically encountered in the work type options of Stock Clerk, Human Resources Clerk, Recruitment Consultant and Sales Representative (groceries). [48] Mr Arthur was subsequently supported with a work readiness programme, which included further physiotherapy. [49] On 18 July 2017, a further FCE was un...

4. Body Corporate 199883 & Ors (Ridgeview Apartments) v Clarke [2010] NZWHT Auckland 22 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...involvement in the actual design or physical construction of the apartment complex and relied on the expertise provided by Mr Martinsen and Mr Andrews. Page | 7 [19] In April 1998 Mr Martinsen applied to the North Shore City Council for a resource consent. The application was made in the name of “P Clarke”. At about that time Mr Clarke began contemplating the setting up of a family trust to which his shares in CFA, the owner of the property, would be transferred....

5. [2021] NZREADT 52 - QH v KE, SE & Agency (14 October 2021) [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...marketing campaign. [77] In addition, QH was not in fact misled by any of the online or print listings and he always knew that the property was not residential. This was based on his own inspections and his discussions with the agents that a resource consent would be required. 4 At [31]–[32]. 13 [78] It is accepted that r 6.4 of the Professional Rules may be breached even without an intention to mislead. The highest and strictest standards in terms of the legisla...

6. 16.-Evidence-of-Mr-Keith-Hamill-Water-Quality64013659.1.PDF [PDF, 1.1 MB]

   ...thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kota...

7. Acting Chief Executive of the Ministry for Culture and Heritage - Taonga Tūturu found at Kerikeri (2015) 106 Taitokerau MB 210 (106 TTK 210) [pdf, 279 KB]

   ...the past 200 years. [33] It is submitted that ahi-kā is a dynamic process and the evidence before the Court shows that only Ngāti Rehia has maintained a true ahi-kā relationship with the whenua, and is an active kaitiaki of the area and its resources. An implicit requirement of ahi-kā is to be prepared to defend that status. The reciprocity expected in exercising ahi-kā and kaitiaki responsibilities is reflected in Ngāti Rehia’s consistent view that within their rohe, it...

8. Appendix-M3-O2NL-OIA-doc-1.pdf [pdf, 524 KB]

   ...Waka Kotahi will send a response to you within 20 working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before 9th September 2022. As you will be aware, New Zealand is currently responding to the COVID-19 Omicron outbreak. As a result, resourcing may be impacted due to staff absences, and the response to your Official Information Act request could be delayed. We will endeavour to provide a response to you within the 20 day timeframe, or as soon as possible. In the meantime,...

9. Biel v Hall - Opepe Farm Trust [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 535 (2011 APPEAL 535) [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Tauhara North is only approximately $17,000. [97] The lower Court stated that it was unclear whether they were aware or understood the implications of several encumbrances on the title which gave rights to Contact Energy Ltd for access to geothermal resources and a right of first refusal upon sale of the land. Any possible exploitation of geothermal resources under Tauhara North will be severely constrained by these rights. [98] The audited accounts, as confirmed by the trust‟s ac...

10. OIA-96282.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

    ...costs $ (e)(c. GST} VICTIM SUPPORT CHRISTCHURCH MOSQUE ATTACKS - MONTHLY REPORT FOR [MONTH YEAR] # This table details the number of victims being supported # The numberof personnel directly involved in the Christchurch response It Any additional resources who ore being fundtd with additional MOJ funding It Any odditionol assets purchased with additional MOJ funding Christchurch response operational costs (actual) Jul-19 Aug- 19 Sep-19 Dct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19 ~ & ~~ Jan-20 F...