Search Results

1. Fisher v Foster (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 54 [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...Principle 6. Accordingly, Dr Foster requested the claim be dismissed or struck out. Delay [13] It is acknowledged that there has been considerable delay in determining this strike out application. Until very recently, the Tribunal has had limited resources, which have led to unacceptable delays in allocating fixtures for telephone conferences, hearings and in the issuing of decisions. See, Wall v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8. This situation was resolved in June...

2. Waitangi Tribunal Hearing Calendar (10 Aug 2018) [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Page | 4 – Updated 10 Aug 2018 1 Wai 2358 - The National Fresh Water and Geothermal Resources – Panel: Chief Judge Isaac; Crosby, R; Anderson, R; Phillipson, G; & Temara, P / Staff: Cameron, J; Hauraki, A; Moko-Mead, H; & Burke, C 2 Wai 2200 – Porirua Ki Manawatū – Panel Members: Judge Fox, Phillipson, G; Kidd, D;...

3. Proactive Release – Amendments to the Criminal Cases Review Commission Bill [pdf, 1.5 MB]

   ...July 2020 to be the most desirable course of action to fulfil the Government’s commitment. 24 I acknowledge that this approach has an impact on the decision-making processes for funding the CCRC, , in that a fall-back commencement date will require resources be provided to establish the CCRC by that date. Further discussion on funding is below at paragraphs 45 to 58. Allowing the court to authorise disclosure of privileged and confidential information 25 In seeking policy approvals, I...

4. Parata v Lake - Ngarara West B3B (2004) 144 Aotea MB 105 (144 AOT 105) [pdf, 557 KB]

   ...19(1)(b). In so doing I have taken into account the likelihood of an application for rehearing or the filing of a fi-esh application for injunction no\v that the section 45 application has been filed, and the use of the Couti's and the parties' resources V\Tere either event to occur. HOV\Tever, for fhture reference counsel should note that the Court is unlikely to be as aCC0111m odating. Disputes concerning this Land are not ne\v. J\,1y reserved decision tenl1inating the trust...

5. AS v DV LCRO 14/2014 (5 August 2014) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...Mr DV’s fees, other than to modify the timeframe within which Mr AS was originally required to pay. Taking into account the six years Mr DV has already waited for his fee, and the fact that Mr AS may have to fund the full payment from his own resources, Mr AS has 28 days from the date of this decision within which to pay Mr DV $30,496.99. Outcome [42] The finding of unsatisfactory conduct and orders that Mr AS be censured under s 156(1)(b), and pay costs of $1,000 to NZLS, are...

6. Rudd v The former trustees - Horowhenua 11 Part Reservation Trust and Horowhenua 11 (Lake) (2018) 392 Aotea MB 179 (392 AOT 179) [pdf, 345 KB]

   ...against the former trustees can proceed as planned at the November sitting. Mr Watson should therefore contact the case manager urgently and provide an update as to when his client’s evidence will be filed. It would not be a sensible use of resources to start Mr Rudd’s case on 21 November and then to have that adjourned because Mr Taueki’s evidence has been received late, which will have the flow on effect of impeding the filing of responses from the former trustees. [16] In...

7. Strengthening the family justice system - PDF version [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...them. Knowledge is crucial. By having an awareness and understanding of the Family Justice Service, and how to use it, people can effectively engage with it. What we’ve learnt During consultation, people told us: • current information resources are difficult to follow • information is provided in formats that not everyone can access (for example, people with disabilities, low level literacy, limited English, no access to technology or living in remote locations) •...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 69 Magnum Hire Ltd v Parker [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...balance of convenience. 10 Employment Relations Act, s 180. 11 Duncan v Osborne Building Ltd (1992) 6 PRNZ 85 (CA) at 87. 12 Employment Court Regulations 2000, reg 64. 13 Grove v Archibald [1998] 2 ERNZ 125 (EmpC) at 128–129; and Bathurst Resources Ltd v L&M Coal Holdings Ltd [2020] NZCA 186, (2020) 25 PRNZ 341 at [19]. 14 Assured Financial Peace Ltd v Pais [2010] NZEmpC 50 at [5]; and Dymocks Franchise Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd v Bilgola Enterprises Ltd (1999) 13 PRNZ 48...

9. GB v PW LCRO 140/2012 (13 August 2014) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...to comply with the Intervention Rule which Ms GB frankly admits. 11 Above n1, Rule 14.2(e). 7 [37] In the circumstances, it would not be an efficient use of the Standards Committee’s resources to refer the matter back, rather than conduct the review to its logical conclusion. Breach of Rule 14.4 [38] Ms GB’s breach of the Intervention Rule does not approach misconduct, but is clearly a breach of Rule 14, which is a p...

10. Standard explanation of effects and implications of anEPA in relation to property [pdf, 249 KB]

    ...imprudent decisions or is subject to compulsory treatment or has special patient status under the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992. Out-of-pocket expenses Things that your attorney needs to pay for from their own resources in order to carry out their role, such as postage and stationery costs, bank fees, travel costs, telephone bills, and legal fees. These expenses do not include lost wages or payment for your attorney’s time. Personal care and...