Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 061 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA K IOTAUTAHI Court: Hearing: Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 61 IN THE MATTER of the Resource :rvianagement Act 1991 AND of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BET\X'EEN UPPER CLUTHA AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the attached...

2. 2019 to 2024 Ministry of Justice statement of intent [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...administrative services necessary to support judicial administration of the court system and to support judicial decision-making. Administrative support includes providing employees in the registries, transcription services, finance, ICT, human resources and funding for continuing legal education and development for judges. In delivering services, we recognise the importance of the constitutional requirements of the independence of the judicial function, and support the judiciary to...

3. [2019] NZSSAA 19 (1 April 2019) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...Assistance, and that her daughter was able to contribute her Student Allowance to the household income. [29] Mr Stainthorpe argued that the Ministry was required to consider the principle in s 1A(c) of the Act that, where appropriate, people use the resources available to them before seeking financial support. He submitted that the appellant’s situation was no different from that of other students and therefore the Ministry was correct to decline to grant Emergency Benefit. Had...

4. [2011] NZEmpC 78 NZ Tramways and Public Passenger Transport Employees Union & Ors v Wellington City Transport Ltd [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...dispute. The Wellington branch secretary of the union has alleged in an affidavit that he was informed by the then general manager of the respondent that the company had such a policy, but in an affidavit filed in response, the respondent‟s human resources manager denies that proposition. He deposes that the respondent has no such policy and claims that each case is considered on its merits. This dispute of fact can only be resolved by a full hearing. If the respondent does not...

5. [2014] NZEmpC 16 Gapuzan v Pratt Whitney Air New Zealand Services second interlocutory [pdf, 49 KB]

   ...action was required. [12] On 9 January 2012, ACC declined the plaintiff’s claim and the plaintiff became aware that the defendant had not returned the employer questionnaire to ACC. He contacted the mediator who contacted the defendant’s Human Resources Manager on 10 January 2012. She arranged for the questionnaire to be sent to ACC that day. ACC then reviewed the plaintiff’s claim in light of the answers given in the questionnaire and confirmed its decision to decline the claim....

6. [2013] NZEmpC 147 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of NZ Police [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...front line/shift work duties; contacted him at home while he was on sick leave in that regard and required him to provide further details of his illness; falsely asserted that he was using industrial blackmail; allowed an identified human resources manager to have an active role in his rehabilitation management and grievance when that person had a conflict of interest, having been the object of his earlier grievance; instigated an investigation against him while he w...

7. Waitangi Tribunal - Matua Rautia Report on the Kōhanga Reo claim [pdf, 4.2 MB]

   .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46 2 .4 .3 The tripartite Relationship agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49 2 .4 .4 Financial resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 (1) incentivising teacher-led services . . . . . . . . ....

8. [2022] NZREADT 10 – HD v REAA and LD (18 May 2022) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...(see the agency’s response of 5 August 2021 to the Committee at 103 of the bundle). 8 [42] There is a checkbox answer section, with templated questions. This includes a question as to whether there were any statements/discussions about “Resource Consent and Use”, against which the “yes” box is marked with a cross. This begs the question as to what was said. The licensee does not deny that the issue of consent was raised. In answer to a question as to whether any...

9. AD v ZX LCRO 87 / 2010 (14 December 2010) [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...employees on the basis of joint employment. However, I would observe, that any lawyer acting for the Applicant’s clients, would have been provided with this information by the clients themselves, who included the former General Manager and Human Resources Manager. Consequently, the confidentiality of the information obtained by the Applicant in advising on the Q and A sheet may be more illusory than real. [46] The Respondent refers to the comments of Asher J in Hana New Zealand L...

10. Adlam v Savage - Lot 39 A Sec. 2A Parish of Matatā and Lot 39 A Sec. 2B No.2B No.2A Parish of Matatā [2015] Māori Appellate Court MB 59 (2015 APPEAL 59) [pdf, 342 KB]

    ...September 2008 by Geothermal Developments Limited (GDL), a company established by Ms Adlam. Both power stations are located on a block of Māori freehold land know as the Bath block. 1 In addition, the GDL power station draws its geothermal resource from a well (KA24) located on an adjacent block of Māori freehold land known as the Farm block. 2 [3] The Bath block and Farm block are administered by separate ahu whenua trusts known as the Bath Trust and Farm Trust respectively....