LCRO 69/2020 CX v DW (21 July 2021) [pdf, 185 KB]
...Mr FU objected to this decision in a comprehensive email to the Court.24 There is no direct indication that Mr DW was involved in compiling this response, but it is likely that his input was required. [44] It was a logical use of the firm’s resources to have Mr FU attend to the research and preparation of the response to the Court. This is a task which a law clerk (a law graduate) is well suited to attending to. This left Mr DW free to attend to matters that required his prese...