[2013] NZEmpC 200 Jonas v Menefy Trucking Ltd [pdf, 160 KB]
...resumed, “Mr Menefy continued to bait Mr Jonas in a way to invoke aggression.” In evidence, Mr Menefy denied that, at the time of the meeting, he wanted to get rid of Mr Jonas. He explained that he was being advised throughout by a human resources adviser and that “the risks of pre-determination” had been soundly explained to him. [20] Mr Richardson further told the Court (in evidence which I accept) that at the end of the meeting Mr Menefy made it clear that he did not...