Search Results

1. Marumaru v Waipakuranui Incorporation (2012) 279 Aotea MB 137 (279 AOT 137) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...– as in this case. Neither LINZ nor the local authority would be aware of the change. This would introduce intolerable uncertainty not only in land transfers but also in other decisions which refer to the land title, such as applications for resource consent. 279 A otea MB 157 A further implication is that it creates a great impediment to incorporations undertaking commercial operations on other than Māori freehold land. Mortgages over newly acquired general land as an...

2. MacGregor v Craig (Second Interim Non-Publication Order) [2015] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 324 KB]

   ...terms of the Act had lent the process a quasi-judicial character and the requirement of observing the principles of natural justice had resulted in an elaborate and protracted system of provisional and final opinions. The length of the process and the resources consumed led the Re- Evaluation team to recommend a conciliation process to be carried out principally by staff rather than by Commissioners. Where this was unsuccessful, the complaint was to be referred to the (then) Proceedings Co...

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 50/06 Tu'itupou v Guardian Healthcare Operations Ltd [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...these words or words similar to them were used. [14] The correspondence following the dismissal meeting is annexed to both Mrs Tu’itupou’s brief of evidence, now sworn as an affidavit, and the affidavit of Mr Walter Bruce Wall, National Human Resources Manager for the defendant. Mr Wall’s affidavit was sworn on the 2 August 2006. [15] On the 14 June 2002 Ms Schaaf wrote to Ms Jolly as follows: As indicated to you yesterday, Mrs Tupou Tu'itupou will be lodging a personal...

4. DA v EB LCRO 7/2013 (26 August 2014) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...reasonable to infer that the Committee would have reached the same conclusion, based on the same logic, if it had turned its mind to s 111. [86] Referring the s 111 aspect of the complaint back to the Committee would not be an efficient use of its resources. The emphasis on responsiveness of the regulatory regime52 [87] In all the circumstances it is appropriate to determine the s 111 aspect of the complaint on review, to avoid the delay that would be associated in referring back...

5. Matsuoka v E Tū Incorporated (Preservation Orders) [2018] NZHRRT 49 [pdf, 824 KB]

   ...This submission fails to take into account two significant factors. First, all proceedings before the Tribunal currently face substantial delay. This is not the fault of the parties. The cause is systemic in that the Tribunal has been grossly under-resourced for a substantial number of years and it has taken me, as Chairperson, at least five years to get Government to remedy the problem. Cross-reference must be made to Wall v . Fairfax New Zealand Ltd (Delay) [2017] NZHRRT 8. The Human Ri...

6. LCRO 71/2022 OM v NT (22 July 2024) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...provisions: 2 Engagement We are pleased to act for you in respect [of] your affairs with regard to: The Sale of the above property. The retainer is limited to those matters described above. Unless specifically stated, it does not include resource management advice, tax advice and advice on financial and commercial aspects of the matter. Costs Our charges and expenses are $899.00 inclusive GST & Disbursements. We will inform you if it will become apparent that our est...

7. LCRO 53/2020 YJ v GK (22 April 2021) [pdf, 280 KB]

   ...application would have made Mr DQ’s application more attractive to the bank. [112] Related to this complaint, is Mr YJ’s allegation that Mr GK knew Mr DQ was incurring additional liability to the bank which therefore reduced Mr DQ’s own financial resources, and this had the effect of increasing Mr YJ’s exposure to the bank by being called upon to meet a greater share of ABCD’s borrowing should there be a default. [113] Mr YJ alleges therefore, that Mr GK has breached his...

8. COURTS126-Lets-talk-court-booklet-2019-Print.pdf [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...for the sentencing. If it’s a jury trial the police should arrange for you to meet the prosecutor before the court date. The Court Victim Advisor will usually meet with you about 3 weeks before going to court and go through some court education resources with you, show you around the courtroom and explain what will happen at court. 18 | LET’S TALK COURT How will I know what I’m meant to say in court? Remember no one is allowed to tell you what to say in court. The people a...

9. [2015] NZSAAA 03, ( 11 March 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...about to go overseas for the rest of the year would have been capable of finding a job in order to support herself over such a period. Furthermore no doubt the arrangements that needed to be made for her overseas study imposed a further drain on her resources which rendered her allowance income even more necessary. On a more conceptual level, it is also certainly arguable that the extra week or so spent in travel/acclimatisation can be seen as an essential part of her study programme an...

10. Deputy Registrar - Orongotea B No 1 (2008) 127 Whangarei MB 18 (127 WH 18) [pdf, 7.9 MB]

    ...undertaken manually and could involve opening up to 10,000 files involving perhaps 20,000 orders and ascertaining whether each order has been Iransmitted and if so, whether it was rejected for registration. Given the enormity of the task and the limited resources in Whangarei to undertake the research I inquired of the Registrar General of Land whether LlNZ was able to electronically identify' through its own systems orders transmitted to it from the Taltokerau registry which have b...