Search Results

1. Budget 2024 Full-List-of-Fee-Changes.pdf [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...in Council, instrument, permit, consent, or notice under the (a) Forests Act 1949 $20 $22 (b) Land Transfer Act 1952 (c) Government Roading Powers Act 1989 (d) Māori Affairs Restructuring Act 1989 (e) Crown Minerals Act 1991 (f) Resource Management Act 1991 (g) Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (h) Climate Change Response Act 2002 (i) Building Act 2004 Filing an application in respect of the following: (a) transmission of order for payment of money...

2. LCRO 162/2015 and 66/2016 IA v CMR (31 July 2017) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...copy of an email Mr IA sent to B dated 6 October 2009 refers to the file, and the outstanding legal fees of $101,329.07 as at 30 September 2009. Mr IA sought reassurance from B that he would be paid although, according to (H), Mr and Mrs CMR’s resources had been exhausted. Mr IA indicated he could not keep acting if he was not going to be paid, and expressed the view that “it would be a great pity if the position that we have achieved were to be prejudiced” because the money h...

3. Nottingham & Property Bank Realtor Ltd v CAC 10057 & Honey [2014] NZREADT 80 [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...Google servers, Yahoo servers, and any other search engine or client that internet users use. He developed that topic in some detail and dealt with other terms such as web crawler, web sites and web pages, hyperlinks, HTML code, URL meaning a uniform resource locator also known as a web address, temporary internet files (web browser internet cache), and web search engines. He then gave his views on the interaction between the RE/Max website and the Ray White website and in general. He...

4. [2020] NZEmpC 46 JCE v The Department of Corrections [pdf, 321 KB]

   ...distress and that was not disturbed in the subsequent appeal. In that case the employee had been a probation officer exposed to unnecessary and avoidable workplace stress over many years, arising from work overload, management failure and office and resource deficiencies.15 He had suffered a severe impact on his health as a result of the breaches and was found to be significantly disabled because of the employer’s actions. [51] In Brickell, which was an action in tort, the Hig...

5. [2019] NZEmpC 54 Hong v Auckland Transport [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...places him at risk of harm; (ii) places other officers and members of the public at risk of harm; (iii) means that AT would have to ensure that Mr Hong had another parking officer with him at all times, which is not an efficient use of AT’s resources and would also place that parking officer at risk of harm; (c) AT has lost trust and confidence in Mr Hong. Safety is the key reason given by AT for reinstatement not being appropriate. Both parties gave extensive submiss...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 179 Pyne v Invacare New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...workplace culture report. It is apparent that the report was prompted by a range of issues within the company’s Auckland office. The report writer spoke to a selected group of staff, including Ms Lincoln, the staff member and Mr Cotter (the human resources manager). Mr Pyne was not spoken to by the report writer. [8] Ms Lincoln had a meeting with Mr Pyne about the 2019 events and other issues on 6 January 2020. She prepared a file note of her discussion and followed up with...

7. [2013] NZEmpC 81 Brake v Grace Team Accounting Ltd [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...viewing discretionary costs, improving the efficiency of administration work and arranging a meeting with the bank manager to outline the problems and to seek support by way of additional facilities. He decided that he needed to get legal and human resources advice should redundancies be needed as he had not ever made any staff redundant in the past. He sent an email to Wendy Macphail of Employment Law Services on the morning of Saturday 10 April 2010 in which he stated: I have...

8. [2016] NZEmpC 42 ITE v ALA [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...shared services project; criticisms the plaintiff had of management within the defendant organisation; concerns relating to perceived flaws in the defendant’s security systems; perceived IT risks for both the defendant and other organisations; resourcing concerns and concerns relating to the competency of other employees of the defendant; concerns about the defendant’s financial expenditure; a perceived personal vendetta against the plaintiff by senior management, characterised...

9. [2010] NZEmpC 72 Horton v Fonterra Cooperative Group Ltd [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...through to Peter Jepsen, PAE’s maintenance planner. [6] In a later investigation meeting, held on Wednesday 20 May 2009, there is a record of what Mr Jepsen told Brian Purser, Fonterra’s Maintenance Manager, and Emma Bennett, Fonterra’s Human Resources Adviser on the site, concerning the removal of the iron. Comparing the record of that interview with Mr Jepsen and Mr Horton’s account to Fonterra, it is common ground that Mr Horton told Mr Jepsen he wanted to take some r...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 40 XYZ v ABC [pdf, 271 KB]

    ...defendant’s protected disclosure policy reflects the provisions of the Protected Disclosures Act. [11] Serious wrongdoing is defined in the Protected Disclosures Act as including the unlawful, corrupt or irregular use of public funds or public resources. The Act contains a number of protections for staff who make a protected disclosure, including that the person receiving the disclosure must use their best endeavours to keep confidential the identity of the disclosing party unle...