LCRO 34/2023 PI v SY (27 June 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]
...importance that the lawyer is able to advise the client as to the scope of the appeal, and, in particular, whether there are any jurisdictional impediments to advancing the appeal. [67] It is self-evidently pointless for a lawyer to engage a client’s resources in advancing an impotent appeal. [68] And there were limitations on Mr PI’s ability to address, in the District Court, all the matters he wished to have challenged. [69] The District Court had no jurisdiction to consider the...