Use the search function below to find recent ACADCR decisions. For older decisions, see:
1031 items matching your search terms
Application for leave to appeal to the High Court on a question of law under s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001. No question of law arising from application that has not already been determined or which is otherwise capable of bona fide and serious argument. Outcome: leave to appeal declined.
Entitlement to surgery s 64 and Schedule 1 – Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal challenging decision of ACC declining request to fund surgery on the basis the need for surgery was not caused by trauma. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Order to dismiss the appeal under s 161(3)(b) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. Counsel for ACC made application for appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution. Grounds in support of application under s 161(3)(b) of the Act are made out. Outcome: appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Appeal under s 149 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. Application for reinstatement of appeal. Cover has been granted, no proper basis to reinstate appeal. Outcome: application dismissed.
Cover for treatment injury s 32, s 33 and s 149(1)(a) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. Applicant seeking review of decision to decline cover for treatment injury. Whether the tremor the Applicant suffered from is an injury. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Application for leave to appeal to the High Court on a question of law under s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Parties seek that appeal be allowed with Walker J's decision set aside and matter remitted for hearing by another Judge. Outcome: appeal granted.
Personal injury/causation s 26 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal against decision to suspend entitlements because appellant's remaining symptoms not due to covered injury. Outcome: appeal allowed, suspension of entitlements reversed.
Leave to appeal to the High Court on a question of law under s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Bona fide question of law that is seriously arguable not established. Outcome: leave to appeal declined.
Leave to appeal to the High Court under s 162 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Whether Court erred not applying more extensive definition of “personal injury” under s 2 Accident Compensation Act 1982. Bona fide question of law that is seriously arguable not established. Outcome: leave to appeal declined.
Application for leave to appeal to the High Court on a question of law under s 162 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appellant's submissions not capable of bona fide and serious argument. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Recall of judgment. Apply for rehearing. Appellant's contention is that he needs to be assessed and should have a litigation guardian as he lacks capacity. Outcome: No power to grant a rehearing. Appellant's application to have the judgment in this matter recalled and a rehearing granted is declined.
Costs decision. Costs awarded on a 1B basis, with a 25% reduction as appellant represented by a non-legal advocate and a further 45% reduction as appeal only partially successful. Outcome: appellant awared $1,807.45.
Application for reinstatement of appeals ACR 243/17, ACR 244/17 and ACR 302/17. Outcome: appeals dismissed
Appeal under s 149 of Accident Compensation Act 2001 against Respondent's decision to decline request for back surgery. Whether on the balance of probabilities the need for surgical treatment was as a result of an injury or whether it was because of degenerative changes. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Work-related gradual process injury s 30 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal against decision dismissing an application for review of decision declining claim for work-related gradual process injury. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Ruling pursuant to r 9(5) of the District Court (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017. Outcome: access to documents not to be provided.
Treatment Injury s 32 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Whether the appellant suffered a treatment injury, and whether that injury was an ordinary consequence of treatment. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Vocational independence s 107 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal from decision where a Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporations suspension of Appellant’s weekly compensation entitlement. Corporation’s decision that Appellant had vocational independence and an ability to work 30 hours or more a week in five identified work types was incorrect. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Appeal under s 149 of the Accident Compensation Act 2001. s 26(1) Mental Injury Caused by Covered Physical Injury. Whether the decision of the Corporation declining the appellant's mental injury claim is correct. Appellant has established that the head injury was a cause of mental injury in a genuine and meaningful way. Test in W v ACC set out. Proof of causation. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Suspension of entitlement for non-compliance ss 72(1) and 117(3) Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal against decision to dismiss an application for review of the Corporation's decision to suspend weekly compensation for non-compliance. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Entitlement to surgery Section 64 and Schedule 1 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal to claim payment for back injury requiring surgery. Outcome: Appeal allowed.
Cover and Entitlements s 67 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Appeal agaisnt decision declining cover for injury. Whether applicant's condition was caused by covered injury. Outcome: appeal allowed.
Entitlement to surgery s 64 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Whether the condition requiring surgery was caused by the appellant's covered injury. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Vocational independence s 107 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Suspension of weekly compensation entitlement. Outcome: decision of reviewer upheld; appeal dismissed.
Late application for review – s 135 Accident Compensation Act 2001. Corporation declined late application for review. Outcome: appeal dismissed.