01.06.2012 | Judge Ambler | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 18(1)(a) | Ownership of dwelling, Fixtures and chattels, Succession to 18(1)(a), Order in favour of non-owner, Equitable interests
Some decisions are published here by the judiciary from courts and tribunals. Not all decisions are published, and not all decisions can be found through our finder.
Find out more about using the decision finder.
View the full list of where to find decisions for each court or tribunal.
Decisions for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court can be found in the Judicial Decisions Online.
There are also tools to help you find publications or forms, as explained on the Document finders page.
743 items matching your search terms
01.06.2012 | Judge Ambler | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 18(1)(a) | Ownership of dwelling, Fixtures and chattels, Succession to 18(1)(a), Order in favour of non-owner, Equitable interests
Lend Lease Infrastructure Services (NZ) Ltd v Recreational Services Ltd
Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2012] NZWHT Auckland 27 decision on issues referred back from High Court TRI 2009-100-000067/DBH 5716. Decision date 31 May 2012. See also the High Court Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2012] NZWHT Auckland 27 appeal decision CIV-2010-404-7805, and further High Court Aldridge & Ors as Trustees of the SL & KM Aldridge Family Trust v Boe [2012] NZWHT Auckland 27 appeal decision on issues referred back CIV-2012-404-003773.
Decision (31 May 2012)
Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.
Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd
Decision Date: 30 May 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Breach of an undertaking / Standards Committee must properly exercise discretion as to whether to lay charges before LCDT / Breach of an undertaking may constitute unsatisfactory conduct depending on the circumstances.
Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.
Decision date: 28 May 2012. Privacy Act 1993.
Decision date: 25 May 2012.
Substantive decision. Complaint upheld.
Huang v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 26 decision on claim by Auckland Council against Mr Lamb TRI 2011-100-000057/DBH 6499. Decision date 25 May 2012. See also the Huang v Auckland Council [2012] NZWHT Auckland 16 decision on liability and quantum of Auckland Council, and the High Court Auckland Council v Lamb [2012] NZHC appeal decision 2932 CIV-2012-404-003516.
24.05.2012 | Deputy Chief Judge Fox | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, sections 215, 220, and 222 | Application by Māori trustee, Creation of an ahu whenua trust, Lease of land, Withdrawal of application by Māori Trustee, Proposal of new responsible trustees
Penalty decision.
New Zealand Educational Institute Te Riu Roa (Inc) v Secretary for Education - judgment of Chief Judge G L Colgan.
Decision date: 23 May 2012. Human Rights Act 1993.
Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the determination of the Standards Committee is confirmed, modified to the extent that no further action is to be taken in relation to the aspect of the complaints not addressed by the Standards Committee in its determination.
Decision date: 23 May 2012. Privacy Act 1993.
22.05.2012 | Judge Coxhead | Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, section 244 | Trusts, Replacement of responsible trust, Transition period to allow for transfer, Trustees’ fees during transition period, Ex-gratia payment
Decision date: 21 May 2012.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Tort / Towing of vehicle / Applicant parked at a plaza and had dinner there / parking only for customers / remained parked after the plaza closed / returned to car and it had been towed by the Respondent (a towing company) / no signage at entrance and no sign in front or behind the row of parking spaces in which the Applicant parked / Applicant seeks refund of release fee / law of trespass to goods / clamping a person’s car is an act of trespass to that person’s property unless it can be shown that the owner has consent to, or willingly assumed, the risk of the car being clamped / same logic applies to towing / distress damage feasant only applies where a person or object trespasses on to land and causes damage / held that the Respondent committed a trespass against goods when it towed the Applicant / notices were insufficient for purposes of warning the Applicant he may be towed / Respondent not entitled to rely on distress damage feasant as there was no damage / Respondent ordered to…
Decision Date: 18 May 2012. An Appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008
Decision Date:17 May 2012. A Charges laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008