Search Results

1. [2021] NZEnvC 052 Rangitane O Tamaki v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATIER OF Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 52 appeals under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN RANGITANE O TAMAIZI NUI-A­ RUA INCORPORATED AND AND (ENV-2019-WLG-000018) JOHN BENT (ENV-2019-WLG-000019) Appellants :MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent TARARUA DISTRICT COUNCIL Applicant Environment Judge BP Dwyer

2. December-2020-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

3. January Coo Applications [pdf, 552 KB]

   ...1977 - Application to the Chief Judge A20120015167 45/93 Mohi Wiremu Hotene CJ 2013/4 - Paratene Mita Hotene - and orders dated 1 September 1998 and 28 January 2000 at 90 WHK 405- 407 and 92 WHK 250-251 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001014 45/93 Lynette Hatton, Jeanette Fifield CJ2013/3 - Mere Porotene – and succession orders made at 6 ADWG 312 dated 12 March 1990 - Application to the Chief Judge A20130001429 45/93 Rochel Nathan CJ 2013/6 - Richard Himiona Kukeme...

4. LCRO 98/2019 EL v SV, DV & JV (31 March 2021) [pdf, 510 KB]

   ...would mean that, with each invoice he issued, the Vs would be obliged to make a fresh complaint. [100] This would be a triumph of form over substance, at odds with a complaints system requiring fairness, efficiency and expedition.18 Analysis [101] I have identified the following issues for determination by me: (a) Was Mr EL providing regulated services when carrying out the administration of Mr OM’s estate? (b) If so, do any issues of competence arise in relation to Mr EL’...

5. DV, RL, YS and TB v AR LCRO 316/2013 [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...clients. Whilst the Committee clearly drew comfort from that assurance, the Committee does not directly address the issue as to whether Mr AW was entitled to make the process of accounting to his clients conditional upon the liquidator’s opinion. [101] I will address each of Mr AW’s explanations for his decision not to release funds in turn. 24 Delay in obtaining information from the liquidator [102] At the conclusion of the substantive proceedings in 2009, Mr AW was i...

6. The Trustees of the Tauwhao Te Ngare Trust v Shaw - Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge at 2013 CJ 567 [2014] Māori Appellate Court MB 394 (2014 APPEAL 394) [pdf, 377 KB]

   2014 Māori Appellate Court MB 394 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO-MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20130009145 APPEAL 2013/8 UNDER Section 49, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Tauwhao Te Ngare Block and a preliminary decision of the Chief Judge made on 9 August 2013 at 2013 Chief Judge's MB 567-594 BETWEEN THE TRUSTEES OF THE TAUWHAO TE NGARE TRUST Appellants AND DONALD SHAW Respondent Hearing:

7. [2017] NZEmpC 94 Crimson Consulting Ltd v Berry [pdf, 268 KB]

   CRIMSON CONSULTING LIMITED & UNITUTOR LIMITED v SAMANTHA BERRY NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 94 [3 August 2017] THE FILES HEREIN MAY NOT BE SEARCHED WITHOUT LEAVE OF A JUDGE IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 94 EMPC 48/2017 EMPC 88/2017 EMPC 150/2017 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CRIMSON CONSULTING LIMITED & UNITUTOR LIMITED Plaintiffs AND

8. Broome v Auckland Council [2017] NZWHT Auckland 1 [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...the CCCs for all work under the building consent. [100] The claim alleging the existence of the duty of care is orthodox. The law is settled that a Council owes such a duty of care when carrying out its statutory and regulatory functions.27 [101] The Trust alleges that in breach of that duty of care the Council: (a) Passed inspections of the deck membrane; (b) Passed the final inspection; (c) Failed to appreciate that the specified deck membrane had been changed from a TOM...

9. Samuels v Matauri X Incorporation - Matauri X Incorporation (2007) 120 Whangarei MB 52 (120 WH 52) [pdf, 9.4 MB]

   IN THE MAORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAITOKERAU DISTRICT Hearing: A20060021404 120 Whangarei MB 52-90 UNDER Sections 1 S(l)(a) , (b), (i) and 2S9 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Matauri X Incorporation BETWEEN DOVERSAAaUELS AND 2, 3, 6 July 2007 (Heard at Whangarei) Applicant MATAURI X INCORPORATION Respondent Appearances: Mr Greg Davis for the applicant Ms Deidre Watson for the respondent Judgment: 5 November 2007 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE D J A

10. [2017] NZEmpC 115 Schollum and Hastings v Corporate Consumables Ltd [pdf, 598 KB]

    ...complete week of inability to work or training. [100] In the Holidays Act 1981 the meaning of gross earnings included salary, wages, allowances or commissions. That must mean the combined remuneration earned by Ms Schollum and Mr Hastings. [101] Ms Cates submitted that the same arguments which were used to resist the case for the plaintiffs in dealing with the Holidays Act 2003 should apply in relation to the 1981 legislation. The submission was that the reference in s 4 of the 1...