Search Results

1. Foster v Accident Compensation Corporation (Cover) [2025] NZACC 145 (4 September 2025) [pdf, 500 KB]

   ...Callaghan opines Dr Holtzhausen’s treatment plan is not consistent with CRPS. Rather, the treatment appears directed at injuries that Dr Holtzhausen noted on the ACC 18 claim form, subsequently commented on and declined by the Corporation. [101] Dr Callagahan reviewed the assessments of Dr Holtzhausen and Dr Black and she concluded: (a) Dr Holtzhausen's diagnosis of CRPS Type I was inconsistent with the pain presentation. (b) Dr Holtzhausen's treatment recommendati...

2. LCRO 22/2025 MG and SG v LB (26 September 2025) [pdf, 349 KB]

   ...propose to get drawn in to examining the distinction between a lawyer being formally engaged and that of a lawyer providing informal advice, but I am satisfied that the applicants took advice from a number of lawyers prior to instructing Mr LB. [101] When responding to the costs assessors report, the applicants, in explaining the extent to which Mr LB had been comprehensively informed of the issues with the defective build, noted that:12 Most importantly, Mr LB was informed by us,...

3. Smith v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work-related gradual process injury) [2025] NZACC 189 (6 November 2025) [pdf, 463 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 189 ACAR 036/24 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN ALEXANDER SMITH Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 August 2025 Heard at: Christchurch/Ōtautahi Appearances: J Angus Burney for the appellant C Hlavac for the respondent Judgment: 6 N

4. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

5. Rangahaua Whanui National Overview volume 2 [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   NATIONAL OVERVIEW volume i i Professor Alan Ward Waitangi Tribunal Rangahaua Whanui Series WAITANGI TRIBUNAL 1997 A Waitangi Tribunal publication © Copyright Waitangi Tribunal 1997 isbn 1-86956-208-9 Edited and produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by GP Publications, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by GP Print, Wellington, New Zealand Set in Times Roman This report was commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Whanui research programme. Any views expr

6. Roborgh v Lay [pdf, 303 KB]

   ...the Act clearly indicates that it concerns weathertightness, and leaks in the bathroom have nothing to do with the weather. 5.4.3 Mr Harrison has referred me to Adjudicator Green’s determination in WHRS Claim 277 (Smith) where, in paragraph 101 he concludes: [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by...

7. Berry & Ors as Trustees of the Burns Berry Trust v Lay [pdf, 301 KB]

   ...the Act clearly indicates that it concerns weathertightness, and leaks in the bathroom have nothing to do with the weather. 5.4.3 Mr Harrison has referred me to Adjudicator Green’s determination in WHRS Claim 277 (Smith) where, in paragraph 101 he concludes: [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by...

8. Gray & Ors as Trustees of the John Gray Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 300 KB]

   ...bathroom have nothing to do with the weather. Claim 027 – Ponsonby Gardens – Unit 2 page 19 of 121 5.4.3 Mr Harrison has referred me to Adjudicator Green’s determination in WHRS Claim 277 (Smith) where, in paragraph 101 he concludes: [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by w...

9. EL1 Ltd & Anor as Trustees of the Eurolife Trust v Lay [pdf, 290 KB]

   ...the Act clearly indicates that it concerns weathertightness, and leaks in the bathroom have nothing to do with the weather. 5.4.3 Mr Harrison has referred me to Adjudicator Green’s determination in WHRS Claim 277 (Smith) where, in paragraph 101 he concludes: [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by...

10. Shepherd & Ors as Trustees of the Bell Shepherd Family Trust v Lay [pdf, 288 KB]

    ...the Act clearly indicates that it concerns weathertightness, and leaks in the bathroom have nothing to do with the weather. 5.4.3 Mr Harrison has referred me to Adjudicator Green’s determination in WHRS Claim 277 (Smith) where, in paragraph 101 he concludes: [101] To summarise the position then, it is sufficient to say that an adjudicator has jurisdiction to determine any claim made in relation to the cause or consequence of the penetration of a Claimant’s dwellinghouse by...