Search Results

1. Bristol v Ngāti Rangi Trust - Rangiwaea-Tāpiri [2017] Chief Judge's MB 269 (2017 CJ 269) [pdf, 435 KB]

   2017 Chief Judge’s MB 269 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20070002188 CJ 2007/007 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF RANGIWAEA-TĀPIRI (Formerly known as RANGIPŌ NORTH 8) – Application to Chief Judge BETWEEN RANGI BRISTOL, AIDEN GILBERT & MATIU HAITANA Applicants AND NGĀTI RANGI TRUST Respondent Hearings: 302 Aotea MB 51-64, dated 29 April 2013 326 Aotea MB 165-238, dated 25 August

2. [2018] NZEnvC 046 Friends of Nelson Haven Tasman Bay Inc v Tasman District Council [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 0 4- b of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an inquiry under clauses 14(1) and 15(3) of Schedule 1 to the Act FRIENDS OF NELSON HAVEN AND TASMAN BAY INCORPORATED (ENV-2017 -WLG-00001 0) Appellant TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent WAINUI SPAT CATCHING GROUP Applicant JILL/AN RUTH FOXWELL FRIENDS OF GOLDEN BAY SOCIETY (I NCORPORA

3. [2018] NZEnvC 122 Lee Valley Limestone v Tasman District Council [pdf, 4.6 MB]

   ...residences, but will not exceed 60dB LAFmax. Dr Trevathan considered that predicted noise levels from the operation of the quarry would not cause any adverse effects on the amenity of neighbouring residents that was more than minor. 5 NOE page 101. 10 [30] Dealing specifically with noise from vehicles received at 1072 Takaka Valley Road (Ms Price's property), Dr Trevathan considered that the measured noise level from existing daytime traffic of around 60dB LAeq would mask...

4. [2018] NZEnvC 131 Grattan Investments Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 18 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC I ~ f IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN GRATTAN INVESTMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000009) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge D A Kirkpatrick Date of Decision: 1 0 AUG 2018 Date of Issue: 1 0: AUG 2018 DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT A: The Court orders, by consent,

5. [2016] NZEmpC 111 MUNZ v The China Navigation Co Pte Ltd [pdf, 505 KB]

   MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC v THE CHINA NAVIGATION COMPANY PTE. LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 111 [22 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 111 EMPC 187/2016 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declarations and injunction BETWEEN MARITIME UNION OF NEW ZEALAND INC First Plaintiff AND HARRY VETE AND THOSE PERSONS LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE TO THE STATEMENT OF CLAIM Second Plaintiffs AND THE CHINA N

6. LCRO 58/2017 EB v AD and BD [pdf, 368 KB]

   ...letters to this Office dated 8 April and 2 May 2014. [100] In general terms Mr EB relies upon the responses that he provided to the Committee in answering the Ds’ complaint, as well as the Committee’s reasoning in its decision. 20 [101] In relation to the complaint that he did not obtain full copies of Mrs FD’s files from her former lawyers, Mr EB said that he obtained those files promptly — that is, within six weeks of her death on [date]. The executors were not s...

7. Taylor v Corrections [2018] NZHRRT 35 [pdf, 308 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 025/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN ARTHUR WILLIAM TAYLOR PLAINTIFF AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Mr RK Musuku, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AW Taylor in person Ms V Casey QC and Ms E Devine for defendant Ms I Zadorozhnaya for Privacy Commissioner DATE OF HEARING: 14, 15, 16 and 17 March 2016 DATE OF DECISION:

8. [2017] NZEnvC 149 Matakana Coast Trail Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 13 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC l ttq Court: Hearing: Appearances: IN THE MATTER AND IN THE MATTER BETWEEN AND AND of an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal seeking the imposition of further conditions MATAKANA COAST TRAIL TRUST (ENV-2017 -AKL-020) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent ASIA PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL (NZ) GROUP LIMITED Applicant Environment Judge JA Smith Environment C

9. B R L v EQC & IAG New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2020-0051 [pdf, 934 KB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-XXXX IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN BRL Applicant AND EQC First Respondent AND IAG Second Respondent Date: 23, 24 January, 10, 11, 12 March, 3, 4, 5, 19 June 2020 Appearances: A and K Cowie for the Applicant No appearance for the First respondent R Ra

10. LCRO 22/2019 HT v MK (29 May 2020) [pdf, 326 KB]

    ...settlement”. [99] Mr MK asked (by email) Mr HT again on 27 June, and on 30 June. [100] Later on 30 June Mr XY told (by email) Mr HT he would prepare the contract of service in favour of BEG, and not to “waste [Mr HT’s] money” on Mr MK. [101] From my analysis of the information produced on this aspect of Mr HT’s complaint I do not consider Mr HT has proved to the standard required, namely, on the balance of probabilities, Mr MK’s retainer extended to requiring Mr MK (...