Search Results

1. BORA Organic Products Bill [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...intrusiveness, the greater the need for justification and attendant safeguards. 1 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. 2 Irwin Toy Ltd v A-G (Quebec) (1989) 58 DLR (4th) 577 (SCC). 3 Clause 9. 4 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162]. 5 Ibid, at [172]. 15. Clause 62 of the Bill empowers an organic products officer to enter certain places (except for a dwelling house or marae) without a search warrant. 16. Warrantless searches h...

2. Tanetinorau - Hauturu East 8 (2003) 122 Otorohanga MB 22 (122 OT 22) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...Trust to be known as Te Aue Tanetinorau Whanau Trust with the tDpuna being Te Aue Tanetinorau. There is an order under Section 222/93 appointing the following persons as trustees: Kevin Archer of 32 Arnold Street, Cambridge Adrienne MacPherson of 101 Armstrong Avenue, Te Awamutu Mere Kohe-Love of Tumu Tumu Road, R D 5, Te Kuiti Tauaroha Holden of 20 Beatty Street, Hamilton Warren John Holden of Tumu Tumu Road, R D 5, Te Kuiti COpy TO: A01-5622 Minute Book: 122 OT 28 The...

3. BORA Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement Amendment Bill [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...concluded that the Bill appears to be consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the Bill of Rights Act. Jeff Orr Chief Legal Counsel Office of Legal Counsel 6 Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [162]

4. Fenton - Rurima (2005) 108 Whakatāne MB 148 (108 WHK 148) [pdf, 412 KB]

   ...Judgment: Introduction A20030005879 UNDER Sections 338(7) and 338(8), Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rurima DAYLE EVELYN FENTON Applicant 19 May 2005, 106 Whakatane MB 178 30 .A.pril2004, 102 Whakatane MB 196 11 December 2003, 101 Whakatane NIB 256 23 December 2005 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY [1] The background to these proceedings is set out in my judgment of 30 April 2004, 102 Whakatane MB 196 and need not be repeated here. In summary, Kei Mer...

5. WHT Annual Report 2019 [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...settlement rate (93%), a tribute to the effectiveness of the Tribunal’s procedures. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Establishment and Function of the Tribunal The Tribunal is based in Auckland. It was established in 2007 by section 101 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). It is part of Government’s response to the ‘leaky homes crisis’ enabling claims by the owners of dwellinghouses (stand-alone homes, townhouses and apartments) to...

6. WHT Annual Report 2020 [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...respectfully urged to consider reform of the tribunal sector, as briefly discussed later. JURISDICTION AND GENERAL INFORMATION Establishment and Function of the Tribunal The Tribunal is based in Auckland. It was established in 2007 by section 101 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 (the Act). It is part of Government’s response to the ‘leaky homes crisis’ enabling claims by the owners of dwellinghouses (stand-alone homes, townhouses and apartments)...

7. Forests (Regulation of Log Traders and Forestry Advisers) Amendment Bill [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...context. 17. On this basis, we regard searches under the Bill as being reasonable, and thus not in conflict with s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. Section 25(c) - Right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty 2 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 3 Above n1 at [162]. 4 At [172]. LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 18. Section 25(c) of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone who is charged with an offence has, in relation to the determi...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 72 Lawton v Steel Pencil Holdings Ltd [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...Regulations 2000. While the financial component was the 4 Morgan v Whanganui College Board of Trustees [2014] NZCA 340, [2014] 3 NZLR 713, [2014] ERNZ 80 at [11]. 5 Moore v McNabb (2005) 18 PRNZ 127 at [56]. 6 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 101(ab), 143(b). 7 Martinsen, above n 3, at [16]. same, a Calderbank offer can be (and often is) made with a financial component that is identical to a previous without prejudice offer.8 [16] The new elements mean the o...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 70 Pietras v Vegar [pdf, 200 KB]

   ...what further steps they wish to take, including by way of challenge 10 At [23]. 11 Fletcher v Sharp Tudhope Lawyers [2014] NZEmpC 182 at [18]. 12 Subject to Employment Relations Act 2000, s 157. 13 UXK v Talent Propellor Ltd [2022] NZEmpC 101, [2022] 1 ERNZ 396. to the Court, which can be on a de novo basis. If the Authority finds the present defendant was not the person who had employed Mr Pietras, and Mr Pietras considers that to be incorrect, he may challenge th...

10. OIA-98433.pdf [pdf, 933 KB]

    ...0 72 304 0 68 293 59 234 53 273 0 45-49 77 362 0 69 335 0 84 376 0 77 372 0 89 347 70 279 63 320 0 50-54 58 296 0 58 290 0 42 311 1 58 316 0 57 304 67 258 62 277 0 55-59 32 206 1 31 198 0 40 182 0 34 235 0 37 269 27 185 42 228 0 60-64 16 94 2 12 101 1 13 116 0 13 122 0 20 159 15 128 22 122 0 65-69 2 48 0 4 61 0 3 64 0 6 83 2 4 67 4 61 10 70 1 70-74 0 10 0 3 22 0 2 14 0 2 23 1 2 27 3 27 2 23 1 75-79 0 3 0 0 4 0 1 7 0 0 5 0 0 6 1 2 0 6 0 80-84 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 Grand...