Search Results

1. [2017] NZEnvC 123 Dunedin City Council v Saddle Views Estate Ltd [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...of Mr Thomson. He is of the opinion 12 that SVEL's operations contravene a rule in the operative district plan. That is sufficiently particular to notify SVEL of the case it has to meet. 11 12 Walden v Auckland City Council (1992) NZRMA 101 (NZEnvC) at 103. C R Thomson, affidavit dated 7 April 2011 at para [3]. 8 [22] The notice of opposition claimed the application is an abuse of the process of the court. I do not see any merit in this point (which was not argued at the...

2. BORA Outer Space and High Altitude Activities Bill [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...8 For example, Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v. Chiarelli [1992] 1 S.C.R. 711 at [48]; Ruby v. Canada (Solicitor General), [2002] 4 S.C.R. 3 at [43], [44]; Charkaoui [2004] 3 F.C.R. 32 (F.C.) at [100], [101]; R. v. Shayler, [2002] 2 All E.R. 477 (H.L.); Murray v. United Kingdom (1995), 19 EHRR 193 (E.C.H.R.) at [58]. 9 See Klass v Germany (1979-80) 2 EHRR 214 and subsequent decisions. 10 (1976) AJHR A.4A. 11 See Zaoui v Attorney-General (

3. Matchitt - Waioeka Parish 350A2A (2005) 88 Ōpōtiki MB 99 (88 OPO 99) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...agreement was conditional on their commitment to pay half of the rates. A letter was also received from one of the owners of the block, Mrs Esther Bartlett (nee Herewini) but added little to the evidence before the Court. Minute Book: 88 OPO 101 It was also apparent that my directions had again not been complied with. Mr Peterson for the applicants explained that the whanau wished to set up a whanau trust in order to consolidate their shares so that Guy John Matchitt and Mona Matchi...

4. Harris - Punakitere 2B3B (2001) 31 Kaikohe MB 71 (31 KH 71) [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   ...._-- - . - -::- :- ' .•• • " _' . .: n . ... . . . :-.. ... _-- ._--_.- ----- ------ - _. - _ ._-- -_.- . - ... . '. - .. .. ... . . ' " ... .. . . ....... --_._----- .' - . " - -r-;- MInute Book: S1 10174 The Valuation Report dated 28 March 2001 values the enUnl bIocI< at $33.550-00. The value of the l1l1I8 10 be partitioned has been caJcUatad @ $2.000 per IlecIanI or $968 far the total atea. TIll. leaves the balance of the 111'8...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 080 Cossens v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...amenity landscape under the operative district plan ", further it was [201 81 NZEnvC 205. [20181 NZEnvC 205 Order B. [20181 NZEnvC 205 Order C. [20191 NZEnvC 17. Application fo r costs by Dr Cassens dated 30 January 2019 at [401- Ibid at [101. Ibid at [111- Ibid at [221 . Ibid at [25I(c). Ibid at [271(b). Ibid at [27I(a). 3 inconsistent with its approach to the visual amenity landscape 12; and (e) a number of small issues through the process built towards a perce...

6. Huriwai - Hinetiraha A2C Ahu Whenua Trust (2017) 66 Tairawhiti MB 157 (66 TRW 157) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...for each section and the trustees of each section were the occupiers and occupations orders for each site were granted. 7 Heta – Taiharuru 4C3B (2010) 99 Taitokerau MB 164 (99 TTK 164) and 101 Taitokerau MB 119-145 (119 TTK 145). 66 Tairawhiti MB 165 [36] A copy of the trust order issued in relation to that decision is attached to this judgment. [37] The trustees and the owners will need to review that trust order an...

7. Maritime Powers Bill [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...action and responses. There are many opportunities for those engaging in illegal activity to evade law enforcement activities in open waters and delays in obtaining a warrant could impede law enforcement. 2 See, for example, Hamed v R [2011] NZSC 101, [2012] 2 NZLR 305 at [161] per Blanchard J. 3 Ibid at [162] per Blanchard J. 4 Hamed v R, above n3, at [172]. 5 See, for example, R v Rao (1984) 12 CCC (3d) 97. 15. Clause 16 of the Bill sets out the criteria for exercising t...

8. [2022] NZIACDT 18 - TQ v Gibson (25 July 2022) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 5 Section 50. 6 Section 51(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151]. 8 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 7, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 b. confirm in writing to the client when applications have been lodged, and make on-going timely updates … Negligence, or alternatively breaches of cls 1 and/or 26(b) of the Code (1) Failed to reply...

9. [2022] NZEmpC 117 QDY v Counties Manukau District Health Board [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...the substantial merits of each case, without regard to technicalities.11 It may call for and take into account such evidence and information, from the parties or from any other person, as in equity and good 7 Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 101(ab) and 143(b). 8 Section 3(a)(v). 9 Section 3(a)(vi). 10 Section 143(f). 11 Section 157(1); and Employment Relations Authority Regulations 2000, r 4(1). conscience it thinks fit, whether strictly legal evidence or not.12...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 05 - UT v Lawlor (18 January 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

    ...containing a full description of the services the fee relates to and/or disbursements that the invoice relates to. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] and [151]. 7 At [97], [101]–[102] and [112]. 7 File management 26. A licensed immigration adviser must: a. maintain a hard copy and/or electronic file for each client, which must include: i. a full copy of the client’s application or other immigra...