Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 234 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment v Samra Holdings Ltd T/A Te Puna Liquor Centre [pdf, 685 KB]

   ...Apply the proportionality or totality test to ensure that the amount of each final penalty is just in all the circumstances. 9 Labour Inspector v Preet PVT Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 143, [2016] ERNZ 514. 10 Labour Inspector v Prabh Ltd [2018] NZEmpC 110, [2018] ERNZ 310. 11 Labour Inspector v Daleson Investment Ltd [2019] NZEmpC 12, [2019] ERNZ 1. 12 Labour Inspector v NewZealand Fusion International Ltd [2019] NZEmpC 181, [2019] ERNZ 525. 13 Labour Inspector v Chhoir t/a Bakehouse Caf...

2. Proactive-Release-Family-Court-Associate-FINAL.pdf [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...Communities; the Treasury; the Family Violence and Sexual Violence Joint Venture Business Unit; Inland Revenue and Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. 49 In com leting its report, the Panel undertook significant public consultation, holding m than 110 meetings and receiving more than 500 submissions. Those most intimately affected by the 2014 reforms – children and young people, parents, caregivers, guardians, grandparents and other whānau members – were extensively surveye...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 165 Yaldhurst Quarries Joint Action Group v Christchurch City Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2017] NZEnvC 165 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act YALDHURST QUARRIES JOINT ACTION GROUP (ENV-2016-CHC-049) Appellant CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Respondent HAREWOOD GRAVELS LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge J E Borthwick Environment Commissioner R M Dunlop Environment Commissioner J A Hodges Hearing: at Christchurch on 22 to 24 Ma

4. 2020-02-19 Ton Snelder Reply [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - PLan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant STATEMENT OF EVID

5. 2021-03-03 Antonius Snelder Relpy Water Quality Amended [pdf, 1.2 MB]

   IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI ROHE ENV-2020-CHC-127 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) IN THE MATTER of the Water Permits Plan Change - PLan Change 7, being part of a proposal of national significance directed by the Minister for the Environment to be referred to the Environment Court under section 142(2)(b) of the RMA BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant STATEMENT OF EVID

6. [2025] NZLVT 13 - Northview Capital Ltd v Hamilton City Council (21 March 2025) [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL AT AUCKLAND I TE TARAIPŪNARA WĀRIU WHENUA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision No. [2025] NZLVT 013 IN THE MATTER of a claim for compensation under s84 of the Public Works Act 1981 BETWEEN NORTHVIEW CAPITAL LIMITED (ENV-2023-AKL-73) Claimant AND HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL Respondent Tribunal: District Court Judge K G Reid (Chairperson) Tribunal Member P J M Mahoney Tribunal Member V M Winiata Hearing: at Hamilton on 22-26 July, 5-9 August and 10

7. [2006] NZEmpC AC 62/06 Clark v NCR (NZ) Corp [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...interests of justice require it but good ground must be established to warrant that course (Huddersfield Banking Co Ltd v Henry Lister & Son Ltd [1985] 2 Ch 273; Waitemata CC v MacKenzie [1988] 2 NZLR 242; and Phillips v Phillips (1993) 10 FRNZ 110). And the broad jurisdiction of the Employment Court under ss 104 and 140 must give it appropriate powers in respect of the processes of that Court. [17] It is unnecessary in view of this authority to resort to any inherent power. I t...

8. CAC20006 v Stevenson [2013] NZREADT 56 [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...that there had to be an agreement between about the amount that would be paid directly to Mr Stevenson. This led to the disputes about the commission which took place after the Lawson agreement was signed. [48] The Tribunal has powers under s 110 to determine that the licensee is not guilty of misconduct but has engaged in unsatisfactory conduct under s 93 of the Act. The Tribunal conclude that the conduct set out does amount to unsatisfactory conduct given the special circumstance...

9. Director of Proceedings (EFG) v Commissioner Police [2012] NZHRRT 8 [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...New Zealand Psychologists Board [2012] NZHC 384 (21 March 2012) at [108]. [37] Next the Director seeks an order restraining the Commissioner from further conduct of the same kind. Such order has already been made in the first decision at para [110]. In this respect we find that the statement of claim offends what might broadly be called the finality principle. The remedy having already been granted it is impermissible to invite the Tribunal on a second occasion to revisit the questi...

10. Otago Standards Committee v Milne [2013] NZLCDT 18 [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...required to be observed under LCA: to be independent6; to observe fiduciary duties and duties of care7; and to protect the interests of his clients8; were all admitted by Mr Milne. 1 A breach of s 110. 2 A breach of s 111 3 A breach of s 113. 4 A breach of s 114. 5 In his formal response filed pursuant to r 7 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Regulations 2008. 6 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 – s...