Search Results

1. SW v Standards Committee LCRO 371/2013 (14 September 2015) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...Whether Mr SW may have had a conflict of interest in respect of the services provided. 3 • A consideration of Mr SW’s decision not to advise the [X] Bank of the advance by Mr TX to Mr UY and Ms VZ. • Mr SW’s failure to keep adequate file notes. • Concerns raised by Judge [AB] in his judgment of 12 February 2013, concerning Mr SW’s professional conduct. [15] Mr SW, in a response to NZLS on 18 August 2013, advised that: • He had no reasonable grounds to decline...

2. [2017] NZEmpC 88 Application for access to court documents [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...Senior Courts Act 2016. 1 That Act does not apply because the Employment Court is not considered a senior court for the purposes of the Senior Courts Act 2016. However, this Court does have jurisdiction to consider an application to access its files. The procedure for doing so can be informal and accordingly AFT’s present application will be considered on that basis. 1 File ARC 56/08. [3] In AFT’s application h...

3. [2014] NZEmpC 69 H v A Limited Interlocutory [pdf, 77 KB]

   ...an application by APNZ News Service to search court file BETWEEN H Plaintiff AND A LIMITED Defendant Court: Hearing: Chief Judge GL Colgan Judge Christina Inglis Judge ME Perkins By submissions filed on 3, 14 and 29 April 2014 Judgment: 13 May 2014 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF THE FULL COURT [1] APNZ News Service (APNZ) has applied to the Court to search the file in this proceeding. The application was made on a pri...

4. Dassanayake v Manukau City Council [2010] NZWHT Auckland 18 [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...2010 COSTS DETERMINATION Adjudicator: K D Kilgour Application by First Respondent for Costs following Determination of Claim Background [1] The claimants owned an alleged leaky home at 10 Navan Place, Dannemora. The claimants filed with the Tribunal an application for adjudication on 10 February 2010 and this was accompanied by the claimants’ statement of claim prepared by their legal advisors. [2] On the same date, the claimants filed a memorandum req...

5. [2017] NZEmpC 65 Lorigan v Infinity Automotive Ltd [pdf, 13 KB]

   ...to file notices of opposition and supporting affidavits in respect of an application for security for costs and an application for further particulars of his statement of claim. Leave is required because the original documentation presented for filing by the plaintiff was rejected on the basis that it did not comply with the relevant requirements, and the timeframe for filing has now elapsed. [2] The defendant has filed a memorandum advising that it neither consents to,...

6. [2008] NZEmpC AC 15A/08 Potter v Australian Consolidated Press NZ Ltd [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN RICHARD RUSSELL POTTER Plaintiff AND AUSTRALIAN CONSOLIDATED PRESS NZ LTD Defendant Hearing: 15 May 2008 Subsequent affidavit filed on 29 May 2008 by the plaintiff and affidavit in reply filed on 12 June 2008 by the defendant (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: Mr M Price, advocate for plaintiff and Mr R Potter, plaintiff in person Mr D Alderslade, counsel for de...

7. ME v TK [2014] NZIACDT 39 (25 March 2014) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...Date Issued: 25 March 2014 2 DECISION Introduction [1] The complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and sought the adviser’s assistance to apply for a visa. [2] The adviser embarked on a course where he repeatedly filed unmeritorious requests, then made complaints on the same grounds. The responses from Immigration New Zealand and the Minister made it clear why his actions were inappropriate. He persisted. [3] He then lodged an appeal out of time; it coul...

8. [2015] NZEmpC 97 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...AND IN THE MATTER of an application for 'unless' orders BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By memoranda of submissions filed on 20 and 30 March and 10 April 2015 Appearances: AF Drake and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff J Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 24 June 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 7) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN

9. Body Corporate 201036 and Unit Owners of Parnell Terraces [2010] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...safety elements of Block F and the date the Code Compliance Certificate was issued. 2 The Issues [3] The key issues to be determined in this review are: Can a claim, for the purposes of section 16 of the Act, also include the filing of a proceeding in a Court? What is meant by ―built‖? Was the complex known as Parnell Terraces built within the ten years before the date on which the claim was filed? Background [4] Section 49 of the Act provides...

10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings v Sensible Sentencing Group Trust (Application by NZ Herald for Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 44 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2013] NZHRRT 20 Reference No. HRRT 006/2013 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY THE NEW ZEALAND HERALD FOR ACCESS TO THE TRIBUNAL FILE BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND THE SENSIBLE SENTENCING GROUP TRUST DEFENDANT TRIBUNAL: Rodger Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr SRG Judd for plaintiff Mr DA Garrett for defendant Mr D Fisher...