Search Results

1. [2022] NZIACDT 29 - EQ v McCarthy (19 December 2022) [pdf, 322 KB]

   ...December 2022 REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: X Adviser: W Calvert, counsel 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Christopher Mark McCarthy, a licensed immigration adviser, was engaged by EQ, the complainant, to file an investor residence visa application. He filed three expressions of interest on her behalf. The second and third expressions were made without instructions. Mr McCarthy also failed to communicate with Immigration New Zealand (I...

2. Employment Court Practice Directions [pdf, 492 KB]

   ...authorities ........................................................................................ 4 4. Final submissions at hearing................................................................................................ 5 5. Electronic filing ................................................................................................................... 6 6. Applications for rehearing ..............................................................................................

3. Body Corporate 180379 v Auckland Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...owners of a block of leaky apartments situated in Fox Street, Parnell. The respondents say that the individual claims concerning these apartments are a nullity because they were previously withdrawn so that a replacement multi-unit claim could be filed. All are agreed that this replacement claim was invalid. The claimants deny that their individual claims were withdrawn or discontinued and have applied to have them adjudicated. [2] We need to determine whether the individual...

4. [2019] NZREADT 58 - Beckett - ruling (13 December 2019) [pdf, 163 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2019] NZREADT 58 IN THE MATTER OF An application to file a late appeal under s 111(1A) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN CHRISTINE BECKETT Applicant AND THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 1901) First Respondent AND ELMARIE STEENBERG Second Respondent AND BARFOOT & THOMPSON Third Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Cha...

5. [2012] NZEmpC 37 Anto v Planet Spice Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...Registrar reported that he had received an enquiry from counsel for the defendant in relation to an outstanding costs decision in this matter. The Acting Registrar advised that after locating the Court file he had noted that relevant memoranda filed by counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant back in March and April 2011 had never previously been referred to a Judge for attention. The oversight, which appears to be wholly attributable to the Registry Office, is regretted. [2...

6. [2013] NZEmpC 30 Looker v AG Walter & Sons Ltd [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...Looker, has applied for leave to extend the time for filing a challenge to a determination 1 of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) issued on 28 June 2012. The parties agreed that the matters could be determined on the papers they filed, without the need for a hearing. [2] There appears to be no issue between the parties that the challenge was attempted to be filed one day out of time on 27 July 2012. The application for the extension of time was filed on Monday...

7. Sax v Commissioner of Police (Strike-Out – Discrimination) [2022] NZHRRT 33 [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Ms J Sax in person Mr R May for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 31 August 2022 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT CLAIM - DISCRIMINATION1 INTRODUCTION [1] In January 2015 Janine Sax filed a discrimination claim in the Human Rights Review Tribunal (Tribunal) claiming she had been subject to family status and disability discrimination by the New Zealand Police (Police). 1 [This decision is to be cited as Sax...

8. Tana v Mahanga - Pukahakaha East 5B (2022) 255 Taitokerau MB 229 (255 TTK 229) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...on 11 October 2022 in which the applications of Hone Tana were dismissed by this Court. Counsel for the parties were to file and serve submissions on costs in accordance with the timetable issued in the substantive decision. [2] Ms Wilson filed her submissions on costs on 25 October 2022 for and on behalf of the respondent, The Pukahakaha East 5B Trust (the trust). Mr Beaumont filed submissions on costs on 1 November 2022 on behalf of the applicant, Mr Tana. He Take Hukikuki...

9. National Standards Committee 1 v Deliu [2016] NZLCDT 27 [pdf, 480 KB]

   ...summary, the primary contributing reasons for delay were the multiple challenges to the process taken by the practitioner and their, some-times slow progression, and his opposition to the Committee’s application to access evidence from the Court files. The intervening and unsuccessful endeavours of the New Zealand Law Society (“NZLS”) to take what may have been overlapping charges directly to the High Court made it proper to await the judgment in that proceeding before procee...

10. [2022] NZACC 101- Stewart v Accident Compensation Corporation (25 May 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...The appeals are from the decision of a Reviewer dated 9 March 2022. The Reviewer declined Ms Stewart’s requests for costs. [2] On 27 April 2022, Judge McGuire issued an Initial Minute which directed that Ms Stewart formally apply for leave to file the appeal out of time and set out the reasons why the appeal was filed late. Judge McGuire directed that Ms Stewart file 2 an application for late filing by 18 May 2022, and the Corporation file a memorandum in response by 8 June...