Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18554 items matching your search terms

  1. Restorative Justice Service Review released

    The Restorative Justice Service Review, which was commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, has been released today. Restorative Justice is a service funded by the Ministry of Justice / Te Tāhū o te Ture which involves victims and offenders voluntarily meeting face-to-face to discuss what has happened and how the harm that has been caused can be repaired. The report examined what is working and what can be improved with the service, as well producing ten recommendations for its future developme

    Located in:
  2. Supervised Contact providers

    This section is for providers of Supervised Contact services and includes a list of current court-appointed providers, and guidance for delivering Supervised Contact. Request for Proposal Update Thank you for your patience whilst the Ministry continues to evaluate the Proposals we have received for the delivery of Supervised Contact services. We wanted to provide you with updated indicative dates for stage 2 (interviews). Shortlisted Respondents notified (indicative) 8 August 2025 Inte

  3. Lawyers & service providers

    ...Court Without notice applications to the Family Court are urgent applications that can be emailed to a specific address. Criminal Procedure Act Learn about the Criminal Procedure Act - this section also includes court email addresses for TCM and CMM filing. Service providers Information and resources for service providers. Print a copy of the information you need Find out how to get printed copies of the information you need. Update your contact details To update your contact details wi...

    Located in:
  4. About us

    We are working with the judiciary and our justice sector colleagues to help make sure New Zealand is a safe and just society. The Ministry of Justice does this by delivering people-centred justice services to provide access to justice for all New Zealanders. New Zealand's justice and legal system protects individual rights and freedoms, sets out what is unacceptable and the penalties for breaking the law, and enforces the rules around how our country is governed. The Ministry strive

    Located in:
  5. [2025] NZEmpC 148 AZK Ltd v JKL [pdf, 131 KB]

    AZK LIMITED v JKL [2025] NZEmpC 148 [18 July 2025] ORDERS PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF THE PARTIES AND OF THE EVIDENCE FILED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT – SEE [5] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 148 EMPC 222/2025 IN THE MATTER OF a variation to freezing and ancillary orders BETWEEN AZK LIMITED App...

  6. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2022 [xlsx, 278 KB]

    ...people on bail or at large, by remand type, 2011/2012 - 2020/2021 This data counts a person once per financial year. The most serious offence they were remanded on 'bail' or 'at large' for is counted. Year is when the charge was filed in court. Note that 'EM bail' is a subset of 'bail'. 'Bail' and 'EM bail' should not be added together as this will over count the total number of people on 'bail'. Data for people with char...

  7. [2017] NZEmpC 77 Idea Services Ltd v Crozier [pdf, 413 KB]

    ...unpredictable. [19] Although it will be necessary to consider later Ms Crozier’s evidence that in some residential facilities for which she worked, there were relatively few occurrences of persons absconding or requiring restraint, I accept that the profile of THL clients is as just described. [20] The Court was also advised that as at early 2017, there were eight care recipients, 23 civil clients, and two persons being assessed. Of these, 48 per cent had previously been inv...

  8. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 67 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...inquiries or Treaty settlements. About three-quarters of the remain- ing claims have historical grievances. More than half of these were submitted close to the 1 Septem ber 2008 dead- line for the submission of new histor- ical claims. Others were filed after the respective district inquiry finished its hearings. Many raise historical issues specific to their hapū or whānau. ▶ to page 8 8 Almost as many claims also raise contemporary (post-1992) issues, often alongside histori...

  9. LCRO 034/2017 TC v DM (30 April 2019) [pdf, 287 KB]

    ...good cause to terminate the retainer; and (c) none of the reasons advanced by Ms TC as “good cause” to justify the retainer being terminated, merited the step she had taken when settlement was imminent. Application for review [13] Ms TC filed an application for review on 27 January 2017. The outcome sought is for the Committee’s decision to be reversed in its entirety. [14] Ms TC’s submission runs to some 11 pages, together with 36 attachments. [15] I do not propose t...

  10. [2021] NZEnvC 027 Director-General of Conservation v Taranaki Regional Council [pdf, 1.8 MB]

    ...cannot determine that the effects of the Project will be appropriately addressed until we receive advice on that acquisition and further mitigation. 4. This proceeding is adjourned until 31 March 2020. 5. On that date we direct that the Agency is to file a memorandum advising the Court of the state of its negotiations with Te Runanga. [2] Since our interim decision, we have been advised that Te Runanga have resolved to support the Project, and that the project agreements have been ap...