Search Results

1. [2025] NZEmpC 19 Postal Workers Union of Aotearoa Inc v NZ Post Ltd [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...February 2025. [2] NZ Post’s first application was made when an application to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal in an unrelated judgment, Rasier Operations BV v E Tū Inc, was pending.1 [3] NZ Post’s second application was filed on 14 January 2025 and followed the Supreme Court granting leave to appeal in the Rasier case.2 The first application was declined partially because it was not yet clear whether the Supreme Court would grant leave and, if it did, o...

2. Mio v Daniels - Waipupumahana A No 6 (2025) 335 Waiariki MB 22 (335 WAR 22) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...Waiariki MB 268. 335 Waiariki MB 24 maintain buildings, employing a farm manager without majority trustees approval, loss due to non-sale of silage, value of hay bales and loss incurred on a fencing project. [8] When closing submissions were filed, the applicant sought enforcement of obligations of trust as specific liability in the way of repayment only relating to: (a) tractor expenses and down payment reimbursement of $68,248.00. (b) unexplained cash cheques of $27,960....

3. [2023] NZREADT 33 - CAC 2102 v LL (4 December 2023) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...Real Estate Agents Act 2008 (the Act). In the alternative, it charged LL with misconduct under s 73(c) of the Act and with a third charge (also being an alternative) of unsatisfactory conduct under s 72(b) of the Act. [2] On 11 July 2023, LL filed a response to charge, admitting the particulars of Charge 1. [3] An agreed summary of facts was filed by the parties on 5 October 2023. BACKGROUND [4] The background facts are set out in the agreed summary of facts and are summarise...

4. 10.4 Appendix D: Environment Court In-Court Media Coverage Guidelines 2011

   ...conditions of coverage should apply: the standard conditions the standard conditions as modified or expanded or both [Give details on separate sheet] 6.[To be completed only if this application has been lodged out of time.] This application was not filed in accordance with guideline 6(2) because   This application, although filed out of time, should nonetheless be granted because Applicant information: Applicant’s name Solicitors1 Name of responsible person2 Business address3 Postal ad...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media centre >
   4. Media information >
   5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
   6. 10.0 Appendices

5. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2020 [xlsx, 278 KB]

   ...percentage of people on bail or at large, by remand type, 2010 - 2019 This data counts a person once per calendar year. The most serious offence they were remanded on 'bail' or 'at large' for is counted. Year is when the charge was filed in court. Note that 'EM bail' is a subset of 'bail'. 'Bail' and 'EM bail' should not be added together as this will over count the total number of people on 'bail'. Data for people with c...

6. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large December 2021 [xlsx, 280 KB]

   ...percentage of people on bail or at large, by remand type, 2011 - 2020 This data counts a person once per calendar year. The most serious offence they were remanded on 'bail' or 'at large' for is counted. Year is when the charge was filed in court. Note that 'EM bail' is a subset of 'bail'. 'Bail' and 'EM bail' should not be added together as this will over count the total number of people on 'bail'. Data for people with c...

7. People remanded on bail or at large and offending on bail or at large June 2021 [xlsx, 280 KB]

   ...people on bail or at large, by remand type, 2010/2011 - 2019/2020 This data counts a person once per financial year. The most serious offence they were remanded on 'bail' or 'at large' for is counted. Year is when the charge was filed in court. Note that 'EM bail' is a subset of 'bail'. 'Bail' and 'EM bail' should not be added together as this will over count the total number of people on 'bail'. Data for people with char...

8. Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Court Outcomes Evaluation 2018-19: Summary Evaluation Report [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...assessed in this evaluation. Qualitative Outcomes Evaluation Resulting from interviews with AODT Court participants (14 graduates and seven exited participants), whānau members, treatment providers and justice stakeholders and review of Court files, the following evaluation assessment has been made: • the AODT Court contribution to improving the lives of graduates and exited participants is good (for example graduates improving their self-esteem, experiencing better relationshi...

9. [2007] NZEmpC WC 18A/07 Service and Food Workers Union v Auckland DHB & 15 Ors [pdf, 17 KB]

   ...AND OCS LIMITED Second Defendant AND SPOTLESS SERVICES (NZ) LIMITED Third Defendant AND ISS FACILITY SERVICES LIMITED Fourth Defendant AND COMPASS GROUP NZ LIMITED Fifth Defendant Hearing: by memoranda of submissions filed on 24 and 27 September 2007 Judgment: 16 October 2007 COSTS JUDGMENT OF THE FULL COURT [1] One of the defendants, Spotless Services (NZ) Limited (“Spotless”), has sought an order for costs against the plaintiff union arising...

10. [2008] NZEmpC WC 6/08 Crook v Sovereign Services Ltd [pdf, 15 KB]

    ...of that amount is $111,012.89. [4] In a memorandum to the Court, Ms Fleming has helpfully advised that under scale 2B of the High Court Rules the appropriate recovery usually would have amounted to $65,200. [5] Miss Buckett also filed a memorandum of costs accompanied by an affidavit of the plaintiff which updates the Court on her present personal and financial situation. [6] I accept Ms Fleming’s submission that this was a complex case. It required an unusual...