Search Results

1. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...nevertheless for the sale of smoothing or making this process smooth today I won't be distinguishing. 20 Q. Oh I would like you to. I actually want to know who do you represent, that was the purpose of the question. A. Yes. Q. And if you could file a schedule even if it’s just an email to the registry so that we know who you are representing, yes. 25 A. Yes. I can do that for the Court. Q. And I would be obliged – very much assisted that if there are some individual...

2. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...nevertheless for the sale of smoothing or making this process smooth today I won't be distinguishing. 20 Q. Oh I would like you to. I actually want to know who do you represent, that was the purpose of the question. A. Yes. Q. And if you could file a schedule even if it’s just an email to the registry so that we know who you are representing, yes. 25 A. Yes. I can do that for the Court. Q. And I would be obliged – very much assisted that if there are some individual...

3. 2021-05-18 Transcript (up until end of day 28 - 14.05.2021) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...nevertheless for the sale of smoothing or making this process smooth today I won't be distinguishing. 20 Q. Oh I would like you to. I actually want to know who do you represent, that was the purpose of the question. A. Yes. Q. And if you could file a schedule even if it’s just an email to the registry so that we know who you are representing, yes. 25 A. Yes. I can do that for the Court. Q. And I would be obliged – very much assisted that if there are some individual...

4. Transcript (week 6 Cromwell) [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...nevertheless for the sale of smoothing or making this process smooth today I won't be distinguishing. 20 Q. Oh I would like you to. I actually want to know who do you represent, that was the purpose of the question. A. Yes. Q. And if you could file a schedule even if it’s just an email to the registry so that we know who you are representing, yes. 25 A. Yes. I can do that for the Court. Q. And I would be obliged – very much assisted that if there are some individual...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 204 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 533 KB]

   ...Counsel agree that the resolution of some of those issues will be affected by our judgment in this case. The facts [5] We find the following relevant facts in this case from four sources. First, the parties, less than a week before the hearing, filed an agreed statement of relevant facts which we will set out below. These proved to be incomplete and less than satisfactory in a number of respects as it turned out and potentially to the plaintiffs’ disadvantage. Second, we have...

6. [2016] NZEnvC 140 South Epsom Planning Group Inc & Three Kings United Group Inc v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...until all parties to these proceedings have had the opportunity to comment on those amendments. We will allow a period of 20 working days from the issue of this decision to enable the parties (other than Fletchers) to consider its findings and to file and serve memoranda commenting on the matters set out above. At the conclusion of that process we will convene a judicial conference with a view to making directions for resolution of the outstanding issues, whether by way of media...

7. Derek Onley (filed 6 June 2017) [pdf, 820 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY ENV-2016-CHC-47 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under Section 120 Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN BLUESKIN ENERGY LIMITED Appellant AND DUNEDIN CITY COUNCIL Respondent 1. I am Derek Onley, ecologist, ornithologist and illustrator. I studied Geography at Cambridge University, then worked at the British Trust for Ornithology and the Edward Grey Institute for Field Ornithology at Oxford before coming to New Zealand in the 1970s.

8. D v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2020] CEIT-2019-0037 [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL CEIT-0037-2019 IN THE MATTER OF CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKES INSURANCE TRIBUNAL ACT 2019 BETWEEN D, G AND S (AS TRUSTEES OF THE D G TRUST) Applicants AND IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Respondent AND MAX CONTRACTS LIMITED Second Respondent AND MAX EQ LIMITED Third Respondent AND ORANGE H MANAGEMENT LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND IN LIQUIDATION) Fourth Respondent AND

9. [2021] NZEnvC 079 Guthrie v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ..._________________________________________________________________ DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT _________________________________________________________________ A: The appeal is declined. B: Costs are reserved. Any application for costs is to be filed within 10 working days and any responses within five working days of receipt of any application. Contents A Appeal and Proposal 5 B The issues to be resolved 6 C Statutory matters 6 D Relevant planning documents...

10. [2021] NZEnvC 180 Northern Land Property Limited v Thames-Coromandel District Council [pdf, 2.2 MB]

    ........................................................................................................................................ 61 Attachments .................................................................................................................................. 64 Draft Structure Plan Provisions (as filed with appellant’s reply) ....................... 68 4 REASONS What this case is about [1] This appeal is about the form of a structure plan to be...