Search Results

1. [2007] NZEmpC WC 13/07 NZ Fire Service Commission v NZ Professional Firefighters Union [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...further agree that this compliance has occurred prior to, and since, the passing of the Holidays Amendment Act 1991. ... [19] The rest of clause 2.6.2.4 includes statements of support for the present arrangements and agreement of the parties to file the present proceedings. It also includes a statement of the effect of ss51 and 53 of the Holidays Act after 1 April 2007, which we find is not correct. The total weekly wage [20] Historically, firefighters’ conditions of employmen...

2. [2011] NZEmpC 161 Rush Security Services Limited v Coverdale [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...the Authority’s compensation award of $3,000, compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Act is confirmed in that sum. [40] The defendant is entitled to costs and disbursements. If agreement cannot be reached on this issue then Mr Blair is to file a memorandum within 21 days and Ms Rush will have a like time in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 12.30 pm on 5 December 2011

3. [2006] NZEmpC AC 68/06 Colosimo & Anor v Parker [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...employer. Resolution of the sole issue in this case will therefore also be determinative of the person or entity required to pay the penalty. [4] Following the award of the Authority, Mr Colosimo and the second plaintiff, Taffy’s Bar Limited, filed a challenge with this Court. This was a challenge otherwise than by hearing de novo where the only issue was the finding that Mr Colosimo was the true employer. However, the relief sought in the statement of claim consists of dec...

4. [2009] NZEmpC WC 5/09 McCain Foods (NZ) Ltd v Services and Food Workers Union [pdf, 68 KB]

   ...[72] I note that the Employment Relations Authority reserved costs on the union’s application to it. All questions of costs should now be dealt with by this Court. If either party seeks an order, application should be made by memorandum filed and served within 1 month of this judgment with the respondent to it having a further 2 weeks to reply by memorandum. GL Colgan Chief Judge Judgment signed at 2.30 pm on 8th April 2009

5. [2012] NZEmpC 218 NZ Airline Pilots Association v Mt Cook Airlines Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...scenario. The judgment of the Court 1 [2012] NZCA 481. of Appeal in the Postal Workers case was delivered on 30 October 2012 and the parties in the present case were then given the opportunity to file supplementary submissions in response. [2] The case comes before this Court by way of a de novo challenge by the plaintiff to a determination 2 of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority) dated 18 December 2009. By wa...

6. Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination – summary record 15th-17th reports (continued) [pdf, 63 KB]

   ...had reported that the Treaty’s legal status was precarious and that Maori rights under that instrument remained legally and politically fragile. In addition, the law amending the Treaty, passed in 2006, set 1 September 2008 as the deadline for the filing of any outstanding historical grievances with the Waitangi Tribunal. He would like to hear the New Zealand delegation’s comments on that point. 35. Another subject of concern was the 2006 Bill concerning the Principles of the Treaty...

7. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM Piritahi Kathryn Ngapo [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...primarily my involvement, apart from committee meetings has involved organising a stall for Saturday Markets to raise public awareness and to fundraise. SCOPE OF EVIDENCE 8. I made a submission opposing the proposed marina at Matiatia and I then filed notice to join in these proceedings as a section 274 party. 9. Subsequently I agreed to become a section 274 party represented by Direction Matiatia Incorporated (DMI). 10. I am giving this, my evidence, for DMI as part of the P...

8. [2014] NZEmpC 159 Franix Construction Ltd v Tozer [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...At best, from the plaintiff’s point of view, it says that the written agreement was in a standard form (a generic copy of which was produced to the Court), one original of which it says was signed by Mr Tozer and was kept by it in an office filing cabinet from whence it has subsequently disappeared. [17] Mr Tozer, on the other hand, denies executing this or any other form of written agreement pertaining to his work for Franix. [18] Franix’s case is that shortly afte...

9. Ryan v CAC 20002 & Skinner [2013] NZREADT 45 [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...the timing and nature of his correspondence with the appellant, the Andersons, Mr Kaur, and other potential customers. [b] argues that it was not because of any delay on his part that the possible contracts did not proceed. [21] Mr Skinner had filed a detailed typed brief and gave extensive oral evidence. [22] He said that he had known the appellant since the 1970s and regarded her as a friend which is why he was prepared to only charge her $500 if he could sell her gift shop busin...

10. Building a return on investment capability in the Justice sector [pdf, 652 KB]

    Building a Return on Investment capability in the Justice sector Date 30 January 2015 File reference Action Sought Timeframe/Deadline Note that there are options to phase the development of a comprehensive ROI capability, starting with emphasis on the cost and effectiveness of investments to reduce crime - Note that the Justice sector already has work underway to improve its ability to move resources to where they will make the biggest difference to red