Search Results

1. Classifications & groupings

   This page gives information about the classifications and groupings used in the reporting for the New Zealand Crime and Safety Survey (NZCASS). For more detail, see the NZCASS Technical manual Demographic and geographic classifications Household composition Offence groupings Damage offences Primary and secondary offences Violent interpersonal offences Demographic and geographic classifications A statistical classification is a way to group a set of related categories in a meaningful, sys

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS) >
   4. New Zealand Crime & Safety Survey (NZCASS) >
   5. Technical information

2. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v O'Boyle [2025] NZLCDT 12 (10 March 2025) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...appropriate penalty orders? [3] Ms O’Boyle acted for a friend who sought urgent day to day care of his child. This was based upon allegations that the child had complained that the child’s mother was violent to the child. Ms O’Boyle drafted and filed evidence that recited disclosures allegedly made to the father, the grandfather, and an unnamed “friend”. The unnamed “friend” was Ms O’Boyle. The proceedings were contentious. By referring to herself in the documen...

3. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Horne [2016] NZLCDT 36 [pdf, 491 KB]

   ...on 1 February 2017 after working to complete the transfer of his clients to the new practice. [20] Having made the orders set out in paragraph [1], the Tribunal then censured Mr Horne: “To your credit you have admitted the amended charges filed against you. The significant factor in these charges that has occurred is the conflict of interest evidence particularly in both the “P” and the “M” transactions. Conflict of Interest is at the heart of confidence in the prof...

4. Khan v New Zealand Law Society [2014] NZLCDT 18 [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...issue a practising certificate to the appellant. Such decisions are made by the Practice Approval Committee (“PAC”) of the New Zealand Law Society (“NZLS”), which declined the appellant’s application on 10 December 2013. The appellant filed three affidavits and was cross-examined on these affidavits before the Tribunal. None of the other deponents who included referees for the appellant and Mr C R Pidgeon QC who appeared for the appellant in the Fiji proceedings, were r...

5. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 v H [2013] NZLCDT 7 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...obtained. He confirmed that the vendor remained a client of the firm. The practitioner further confirmed that he applied to the Department of Building and Housing for a determination on the council’s decision not to issue a CCC but that this was not filed until 18 May 2009. He stated that he considered the leaks in the building were due to guttering maintenance problems which would be addressed by the complainant herself. [7] The practitioner confirmed that at a meeting in 2008...

6. Waitangi Tribunal - Report on the Māori Community Development Act Claim [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...rā te pūrongo a te roopu Whakamana i te tiriti o Waitangi, kua puta mai ki te awatea kua tukuna atu ki a kōrua, otirā ki ngā Minita katoa o te Whare Paremata tēnā koutou Please find enclosed the Waitangi tribunal’s report on the claim filed on behalf of the new Zealand Māori Council under section 6(1) of the treaty of Waitangi act 1975 alleging that the Crown, through te Puni kōkiri (TPK), in reviewing the Māori Community Development act 1962 and the role of Māori Wardens...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 206 Ngai Te Hapu Incorporated v Bay of Plenty Regional Council [pdf, 4.1 MB]

   ...if the conditions of consent could be settled, this may shorten any submissions in relation to the questions of costs and the stay. Tapuika and the Iwi Collective [7] Mr Hohepa-Maxwell, representing the Tapuika Iwi and the Iwi Collective, had filed a letter with the Court indicating concerns about the settlement. He appeared to be unaware that both Mr Pou and Mr Makgill were representing various aspects of the Te Arawa interests in this area, and relevant counsel agreed to meet wi...

8. 2019-10-01-MfE-Professor-Skeltons-Report.pdf [pdf, 1.9 MB]

   Investigation of Freshwater Management and Allocation Functions at Otago Regional Council Report to the Minister for the Environment by Professor Peter Skelton CNZM; D.Nat.Res (Hon); LLB; FEIANZ 1 October 2019 ii Acknowledgements Peter Skelton wishes to acknowledge the considerable assistance he has received from Ministry for the Environment officials Robert McClean, Carly O’Connor and Rowan Taylor in both the investigation work a

9. [2022] NZEnvC 253 Tararua District Council v Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...dated 2 November 2022 14 December 2022 14 December 2022 FINAL DECISION OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT 2 A: Consent is granted for a term of 15 years, subject to the conditions attached. B: Costs are reserved. Any application for costs is to be filed within 15 working days, with reply submissions to be filed within a further 10 working days, and final reply (if any) within a further five working days. REASONS Background [1] This decision relates to appeals against a decision o...

10. Evaluation of early outcomes of Te Kooti Rangatahi/Rangatahi Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    EVALUATION OF NGĀ KOOTI RANGATAHI Evaluation of the Early Outcomes of Ngā Kooti Rangatahi Submitted to the Ministry of Justice 17 December 2012 EVALUATION OF NGĀ KOOTI RANGATAHI Final Report 2 He Mihi “E tipu e rea, ka tipu koe hei tangata. Ka ruru e koe ki te tūāuri Hei amonga mōhou ki te pūtake o ngā kōrero e!” (Te Wī o Te Rangi, Ngai Tamatea) E aku nui, e aku rahi, e aku whakatamarahi