19427 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH ENV-2020-CHC-127 IN THE MATTER OF The Resource Management Act 1991 AND Of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 to the Regional Plan: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Applicant Hearing Commenced: 12 April 2021 held in Cromwell Court: Environme
...semi-structured interview guide agreed with the Ministry. The semi-structured interview guide allowed participants to introduce new topics of importance for them into our kōrero. Some interviews were audio-recorded and notes taken from the audio-file, and others had notes taken of the kōrero. We used a spreadsheet to record interview data. We undertook preliminary analyses to identify emerging themes, including points of alignment and differences between interview participants. T...
...Manawatū inquiry 4 (2) Muaūpoko claimant groups pursue different courses 4 (3) The Porirua ki Manawatū research casebook and Nga Kōrero Tuku Iho 5 (4) Urgency application filed : Muaūpoko Tribal Authority mandate 6 (5) Priority granted for Muaūpoko claims 7 1 2 3 Completing Muaūpoko-specific research and preparation for hearings...
...notice of termination of his employment. The Authority also awarded Mr Samoa compensation under s 123(1)(c)(i) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) of $5,000. RSSL was also ordered to reimburse Mr Samoa the sum of $70 for the Authority filing fee but, because he represented himself in that forum, no costs were awarded. [6] The parties had a written “INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT CASUAL EMPLOYMENT”. Included in this short agreement were the following provisions:...
...successful and, subject to any pre-trial offers of which I am unaware, Mr Taylor is entitled to a contribution to his costs both in the Authority and in the Court. The parties are encouraged to agree costs. If they are unable to do so, Mr Beck should file and serve a memorandum within 30 working days. Mr Nidd will then have 20 working days in which to respond. A A Couch Judge Signed at 2.40 pm on 7 December 2011.
...course of her employment. [41] Those findings of fact are sufficient to dispose of the case. The plaintiff‟s claim is dismissed and the defendant is awarded costs. If agreement cannot be reached on the issue of costs then Mr Scotland is to file and serve a memorandum within 21 days and Ms Kennedy is to have a like period in which to respond. A D Ford Judge Judgment signed at 9.30 am on 25 May 2011
...[61] The Authority did not award costs and they remain to be fixed as do the costs on the challenge. [62] Counsel are invited to reach agreement on both of these matters but if they are unable to do so counsel for the defendant is to file a memorandum as to costs in the Authority and the Court within 28 days of this decision. The plaintiff has 14 days to respond to that memorandum. C M SHAW JUDGE Judgment signed at 10.00 am on 7 November 2008...
...fall. In any event, the worker was legally aided and it would be inappropriate to order the worker to make any contribution to the farmer’s costs beyond the extent of his contribution to legal aid. If counsel wish to be heard on costs, they may file memoranda within 21 days after the date of this decision. Otherwise, there will be no order for costs. A A Couch Judge Judgment signed at 1.00pm on 20 March 2009
...incentive payments made to them. [51] The question of quantum was not addressed in this challenge. That is a matter for the parties to sort out between them. Costs [52] These were reserved. If the parties cannot agree these, the defendant is to file a memorandum as to costs within 28 days of this decision. The plaintiff has 14 days to respond. JUDGE Judgment signed at 4pm on 13 July 2006 AFFCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED V THE NEW ZEALAND MEAT WORKERS AND RELATED TRADES UNION...
...award of costs. I do not make a ruling to that effect, however, and it is now a matter for the Board whether it wishes to seek costs. If so, I expect counsel will discuss the matter in the first instance. Failing agreement, Mr Harrison should file and serve a memorandum within 30 working days after the date of this decision. Mrs Guthrie will then have 20 working days after service in which to respond. A A Couch Judge Signed at 10.00am on 5 November 2012....