Search Results

1. OIA-98475.pdf [pdf, 486 KB]

   ...in Table 1. provided in your previous response. In response to your request, please find Table 1 enclosed. Table 1 provides the number of applications for Warrants to Enforce under sections 72 and 73 of the CoCA broken down by application type, filing method, outcome, and gender, for applications filed between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2022. If you are not satisfied with my response, you have the right to complain to the Ombudsman under section 28(3) of the OIA. The Ombudsman may be...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 108 Te Kotahitanga o Te Atiawa Trust v New Plymouth District Council [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...THE ENVIRONMENT COURT ON AN APPLICATION FOR WAIVER A: The application for waiver is granted. Transpower New Zealand Limited is joined as party to this appeal under s 274 of the Act. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] This appeal was first filed on 28 June 2023 and subsequently amended on 3 July 2023. It is an appeal made against decisions related to the Proposed New Plymouth District Plan. [2] The appeal is being case managed together with other appeals against the Propose...

3. S Ltd v TT [2024] NZDT 66 (11 January 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...before payment is made. 10. It is clear that S Ltd provided TT with all reasonable assistance to obtain the warranty. It is therefore entitled to full payment of its invoice in the amount of $702.54. 11. The claim also sought recovery of the filing fee in the Tribunal. The provisions of section 43 of the Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 prevent the Tribunal from awarding the filing fee except in limited circumstances. As this claim does not fall within the circumstances stated the fil...

4. OIA-120531.pdf [pdf, 847 KB]

   ...request: Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), on 18 March 2025 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). Specifically, you requested: 1. Number of criminal charges filed every year (i.e. calendar year) since the Harmful Digital Communications Act came into force in July 2015 and the number of people these charges related to - so yearly stats from 2015 (half year for 2015 and yearly thereafter) up to 2024 2....

5. CT & KT v BD [2024] NZDT 478 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...was a director, namely, ‘CC Ltd,’ trading as ‘FO.’ The Tribunal found [paragraph 13) of the decision of 7 September 2023 refers] that BD was personally liable for the breach of the Fair Trading Act by his company. 2) BD, on 20 May 2024, filed an application for a rehearing. That application states: “I was in hospital at the time of the hearing. This was a company debt and should have been directed to the liquidators. The job was done by FO Ltd-invoice provided. The client sho...

6. Can I dispute a fine?

   Whether you are able to dispute a fine will depend on a number of circumstances. This page will help you with the process depending on the kind of fine you have. On this page: Dispute a court-imposed fine Dispute that a fine has been filed in court How to apply If you are not sure what kind of fine you have, call us on 0800 4 FINES or check this page: Help working out what kind of fine you have Our hours are 8.00am - 7.00pm, Monday - Friday. Dispute a court-imposed fine You have 28 days...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About fines

7. Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime

   Overview The Ministerial Advisory Group for Victims of Retail Crime was established by the Minister of Justice, Hon Paul Goldsmith, and the Associate Minister of Justice, Hon Nicole McKee, on 11 July 2024. Besides the Chair, the advisory group comprises four members with extensive expertise across the retail sector. The Ministerial Advisory Group was established to provide the Ministers with high quality, independent advice, develop practical, evidence-based proposals, policies, and legislative

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy

8. AA v AB LCRO 298/2011 (9 October 2014) [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...3 [16] In summary, Mr AA submits that Mr AB failed to provide him with competent and appropriate legal advice. [17] In its decision delivered on 24 November 2011, the Standards Committee, after considering the comprehensive submissions filed from Mr AA and counsel for Mr AB, determined to make no adverse findings against Mr AB. Application for Review [18] Mr AA applies to review the decision of the Standards Committee. [19] He filed comprehensive submissions in support...

9. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...Applicant AND NC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Background [1] Mr RS (the Applicant) and his brother Mr AS and other members of their whānau had filed a claim in the Waitangi Tribunal claiming rights to land in the [District X] area of the [Area A]. They had forwarded a Statement of Claim to the Tribunal in mid 2008, but the claim was not able to be registered until more information was...

10. Harland v ACC [2012] NZACA 6 [pdf, 408 KB]

    ...ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING on the papers APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Peter Nee Harland for appellant Paul McBride for respondent DECISION: APPLICATION TO REINSTATE APPEAL [1] The application is to reinstate the appeal filed under ACA No. 02/05 (the appeal) that Mr Nee Harland withdrew on the applicant's behalf on 14 March 2007. [2] The appeal was against a review decision dated 20 February 2003 (the review U"(J1:;lllJl~,,-::::;:::-~ which in t...