Search Results

1. FV Notice of Intention to Appear [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Home Address Occupation Respondent Full name Home Address Occupation Associated Respondent (if applicable) (Leave this section blank if it does not apply.) Full name Home Address Occupation COURT USE ONLY: Date document is filed: (Court stamp) PAGE 2Notice of intention to appearV1 June 2019 This document is filed by: Name Address for service* If filed by lawyers: Name of acting lawyer  Contact number PAGE 3Notice of intention to appearV1 June 2019...

2. COVID-19-Combined-L3-and-L2-Protocol-August-2020-ARLA.pdf [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...parties and the Authority agree it is appropriate and in the interests of justice to do so. Hearings by remote participation will be subject to the relevant scheduling factors above and on the parties having the technology needed to participate. Filing applications Applications and associated documents can continue to be filed with the Authority. Parties are urged to file documents electronically at: arla@justice.govt.nz Paper applications will continue to be accepted by pos...

3. [2020] NZEmpC 156 McCook v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 181 KB]

   ...effects what Mr Cranney describes as tidying up amendments. 1 Head v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [2020] NZEmpC 155. [6] In all the circumstances, I grant leave for the filing of this statement of claim and direct that amended statements of defence are to be filed and served within 14 days of today. B A Corkill Judge Judgment signed at 3.00 pm on 30 September 2020...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 185 S v N [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...for an extension of time. The ground relied on was that N had not been able to act within time because her advocate was unavailable having had surgery rendering him unfit for work. In anticipation of being successful, a notice of opposition was filed containing the grounds on which N intends to contest the application for a stay. [5] Initially S opposed N’s application before consenting to it. By consent, therefore, N’s application is granted. The notice filed in anticipat...

5. [2025] NZEmpC 27 Tradezone Industrial Group Ltd v Stanton [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...orders in this matter on an ex parte basis.1 I directed that the orders that I made on that occasion would expire after 5 pm on 24 February 2025. A review was scheduled for this morning.2 [2] By the time of the review hearing, documents had been filed by the parties which raised issues that could not be resolved at the hearing. 1 TradeZone Industrial Group Ltd v Stanton [2025] NZEmpC 15. 2 At [57]. [3] By consent, however, it is agreed that the freezing and inte...

6. J.Kim v K.Kim [2015] NZIACDT (13 March 2015) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...Registrar: K England, Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment, Auckland. Complainant: S Laurent, Laurent Law, Auckland. Adviser: In person. Date Issued: 13 March 2015 2 DECISION The issue [1] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint dated 20 November 2014. Through her counsel, Ms Kim responded with an application to dismiss the complaint on the grounds: [1.1] The Statement of Complaint does not comply with the Tribunal’s practice note. [1.2...

7. Ye v Wang [2015] NZIACDT 23 (13 March 2015) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...Registrar: K England, Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment, Auckland. Complainant: In person. Adviser: S Laurent, Laurent Law, Auckland. Date Issued: 13 March 2015 2 DECISION The issue [1] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint dated 9 December 2014. Through her counsel, Ms Wang responded with an application to dismiss the complaint on the grounds: [1.1] The Statement of Complaint does not comply with the Tribunal’s practice note. [1.2...

8. Tioro v McCallum - Estate of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 427 (2017 APPEAL 427) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...decision of the Māori Land Court in respect of the estate of Ngapiki Waaka Hakaraia was heard at the Aotea Māori Land Court on 10 August 2017. In an oral decision the Court dismissed the appeal and gave leave to the successful respondent to file submissions in respect of costs. [2] Counsel for the first respondent filed submissions as to costs on 24 August 2017, and the appellant filed submissions in response on 8 September 2017. Reply submissions from the first respondent were...

9. Nicholls v Nicholls - Koromatua 3A Block [2018] Māori Appellate Court MB 165 (2018 APPEAL 165) [pdf, 264 KB]

   ...filed by counsel on 27 February 2018 to support a request for Special Aid: Counsel is instructed that the applicant is now impecunious. The applicant is on a welfare benefit receiving fortnightly payments of $422.00 after tax. He initially paid the filing fee of $350 to his counsel to get his appeal underway which amount he borrowed from a family member. [9] It is a reasonable inference that if the appellant cannot pay the filing fee for his appeal, then it is unlikely that he will...

10. [2018] NZLCDT 14 Central Standards Committee 3 v Meyrick [pdf, 1.9 MB]

    ...conduct in making false declarations to the New Zealand Law Society about his compliance with fines and costs orders imposed by Standards Committees and the LCRO. There is an alternative charge of unsatisfactory conduct.2 [3] The respondent filed responses denying the charges. He did not file any affidavit evidence to support his denials of the charges. There was a direction that he do so seven days prior to the confirmed hearing date. He did not comply with that direction giv...