Search Results

1. DW and AW v EQC and State Insurance [2019] CEIT-2019-0001 [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...against the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and State Insurance, a business division of IAG New Zealand Ltd. The next day the application was served electronically on both respondents advising each that, if they wished to oppose the application, they must file their response with the Tribunal and serve it upon DW and AW within 15 working days. [2] Each respondent, therefore, has until 17 July 2019 to file their response and supporting documentation. EQC has not yet taken any formal step...

2. [2008] NZEmpC WC 10/08 Monteith v Eagle [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...the 28-day time period for challenging a determination of the Employment Relations Authority. The determination was given on 25 July 2007 (WA 103/07). Mrs Monteith attempted to file a challenge on 6 September 2007, which was 15 days late. She filed an application for extension of time on 5 October 2007. Sequence of events [2] The employment relationship between the parties began in January 2006 and ended on 22 September 2006 when Mrs Monteith dismissed Ms Eagle. [3] Ms Eagle...

3. Far North District Council v Austen - Okau 3B2B2D and Okahu 4D (2022) 248 Taitokerau MB 92 (248 TTK 92) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ M P ARMSTRONG Judgment of Judge M P Armstrong 248 Taitokerau MB 93 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 31 May 2018, the Far North District Council (FNDC) filed an application seeking directions from the Court as to the process it should follow and with whom it should negotiate concerning access to the Kauri dam and pump station. At issue was realigning an existing easement to cross Okahu 4D wh...

4. [2022] NZACC 41 – Judkins v ACC (17 March 2022) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...due to deterioration. As a result, weekly compensation was reinstated from May 2015. 1 Judkins v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACC 57. 2 Judkins v Accident Compensation Corporation [2015] NZACC 47. 3 [8] Mr Judkins then filed a late review application against the Corporation’s 12 March 2013 decision, which had declined to reassess VI on the basis that there had been no deterioration at that time. On 26 January 2016, the Reviewer held that the Corporation h...

5. [2021] NZACC 127 - Jones v ACC (11 August 2021) [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...demonstrated that the circumstances of this case warrant a recall of the 2018 Substantive Decision. [3] Mr Jones filed an application for leave to appeal the 2018 Substantive Decision to the High Court. Directions were given by the Authority for the filing of written submissions in support of the application, but none were filed. On 18 June 2019, the Authority proceeded to issue a decision declining the application. (“the 2019 Leave Decision”). Mr Jones filed an applicati...

6. LCRO 47/2021 BQ v ZG (16 December 2024) [pdf, 665 KB]

   ...admitted to the bar just four months earlier. 1 Applicant’s letter to the Lawyers Complaints Service (LCS) (31 January 2017) at 7. 2 See paragraphs [429]–[434]. 3 See paragraphs [220]–[237]. 3 [11] The first letter on Firm DE’s file is dated 26 March 2014, the date Mr CM took the respondent’s instructions. Ms ND had primary carriage of the file for Firm DE between that date and 29 April 2014. [12] Ms ND arranged uplift of the respondent’s file from Firm A and r...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 163 Bay of Plenty DHB v Cliff [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...legislation. 2 Rather an application to extend time is required. In that case Judge Couch was prepared to treat the application as one seeking an order of the Court pursuant to s 219 of the Employment Relations Act 2000, extending the time for filing a statement of claim necessary to commence a challenge. I approach the present application in the same way. 1 Cliff v The Bay Of Plenty District Health Board [2015] NZERA Aucklan...

8. NZCVS Cycle 4 resources and results

   Cycle 4 (November 2020 – November 2021) NZCVS Cycle 4 (2020/21) Full-size Core This report provides detailed insights and analysis of the New Zealand Crime and Victims Survey (NZCVS) Cycle 4 results. The report contains mostly descriptive statistics. It does not include analysis of relationships between variables. NZCVS Cycle 4 (2020-21) Core Report NZCVS Cycle 4 (2020-21) Key Findings This document summarises key findings of the NZCVS Cycle 4 (2020-21). NZCVS Cycle 4 (2020-21) Key Findings Bo

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS)

9. [2023] NZIACDT 10 - NG v Murthy (15 March 2023) [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...the Minister of Immigration to grant a discretionary visa to those unlawfully in the country. 3 [8] There was a meeting between Ms Murthy and the complainant on 8 April 2022. The complainant terminated her services and requested that the file be forwarded to the new adviser. She confirmed in a later email to him that day that he had terminated her services and she would transfer the file to his new adviser, Mr Vanisi, as soon as possible. In another email Ms Murthy sent to...

10. LCRO 382/2013 SC v JT (30 June 2017) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...[2] Mr JT was instructed by Ms CA. Ms CA paid a retainer of $50,000 to Mr JT. [3] In May 2013, Ms CA terminated her retainer with Mr JT. Mr SC was instructed. [4] On 30 May 2013, Mr SC wrote to Mr JT making request for the return of Ms CA’s files, and for an accounting of the funds received by him. [5] Mr JT responded on 1 June 2013. In that correspondence, he provided explanation as to why he considered he was not, at that time, able to deliver the files 2 requested. No...