Search Results

1. ZA v YB LCRO 164/2013 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...application for recusal or the decision on costs, this Office is functus officio. LCRO XX/2013 is closed. [5] The High Court’s comments clarify that the passing of a deadline imposed by a LCRO does not preclude late filing by a party. If late-filed correspondence may affect the filing party’s rights, receipt of it should be recorded and addressed in the decision. Practically, a filing deadline is unlikely to be effective if the decision in question is not ready to sign when the...

2. ZA v YB LCRO 135/2014 Recusal (31 August 2016) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...application for recusal or the decision on costs, this Office is functus officio. LCRO XX/2013 is closed. [5] The High Court’s comments clarify that the passing of a deadline imposed by a LCRO does not preclude late filing by a party. If late-filed correspondence may affect the filing party’s rights, receipt of it should be recorded and addressed in the decision. Practically, a filing deadline is unlikely to be effective if the decision in question is not ready to sign when the...

3. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 3663 [2013] NZCOP 7 [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...ON THE PAPERS DECISION The Application [1] The applicant has applied under s 122J of the Copyright Act 1994 (the 1994 Act) for an award under s 122O of that Act. Sections 122A-122U of the 1994 Act were added by the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (the 2011 Act). These sections establish a “special regime for taking enforcement action against people who infringe copyright through file sharing” (s 122B(1)). The applicant seeks an award against the res...

4. Guo v Culpan (Strike-Out) [2018] NZHRRT 25 [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...appointment with Dr Culpan that had been arranged by her employer, Price Waterhouse Cooper (PwC). Ms Guo attended a further appointment with Dr Culpan in January 2010. On 31 August 2015, Ms Guo requested Dr Culpan to provide her with her medical file. The file was provided to her on 29 September 2015. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Guo v Culpan (Strike-Out) [2018] NZHRRT 25] 2 [3] On 6 May 2016, Ms Guo filed a claim in the...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 78 New Zealand Nurses Organisation v Waikato District Health Board interlocutory [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 78 EMPC 43/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application by the defendant to extend time for filing a challenge to a determinaton of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND NURSES ORGANISATION First Plaintiff AND MARISSA PANETTIERE Second Plaintiff AND WAIKATO DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD...

6. Notices of hearing

   Notices of hearing include the sitting schedule of the Environment Court. Notices of hearing will be posted here as they occur. 2025 December 15 December 2025 Blakes Road Kingcraft Group v Selwyn District Council 16 December 2025 Hartland v Auckland Council 17 December 2025 Auckland Council v Eco Earth NZ Limited & Ors 17 December 2025 SDC v NZAgri Development Ltd and others 2026 February  10 February 2026 Ellper Holdings Limited v Auckland Council March 2 March 2026 Zhao & Chen v N

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. About the Environment Court

7. Where to file documents

   You can submit this file type electronically and pay any associated fee through  File and Pay. You should file your documents in the High Court registry where your case is being heard. You can file a document by: delivering it to the Registry by hand; or sending it to the Registry’s address for filing. The document is filed when it is received by the Registry. If you do not deliver the document to the Registry by hand, you will be notified when the document has been received by the Regi...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a criminal case in the High Court

8. Recording Industry Association of New Zealand v Telecom NZ 4451 [2013] NZCOP 15 [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...TRIBUNAL WARWICK SMITH HEARING ON THE PAPERS DECISION Introduction [1] This is an application by Recording Industry Association of New Zealand Incorporated (“the Applicant”) for an order under s.122O of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011 (“the Act”). The Applicant seeks an order for payment of a sum of money in respect of infringing file sharing for which the Respondents are alleged to be liable. [2] The Applicant has made the application a...

9. LCRO 260/2013 CS v RV (18 July 2017) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...the parties in this decision have been changed. Introduction [1] Mr CS has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee dated 17 July 2013 in which the Committee concluded that Mr CS’s failure to progress Mr RV’s file over a number of years constituted unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). Background [2] In 2006 Mr RV, believing he was entitled to make a claim against the estate of his grandmother, instr...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 140 French v Accident Compensation Corporation [pdf, 133 KB]

    ...challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN MALCOLM FRENCH Plaintiff AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Defendant Hearing: By submissions filed on 4 and 19 July 2012 Judgment: 22 August 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] On 20 June 2012 this matter came before the Court for the hearing of an opposed application for adjournment by the plaintiff. At...