Search Results

1. Bristol v Ngāti Rangi Trust - Rangiwaea-Tāpiri [2017] Chief Judge's MB 269 (2017 CJ 269) [pdf, 435 KB]

   ...Wackrow Williams & Davies Limited, DX Box CP20503, Auckland mailto:tom@bennion.co.nz mailto:mmc21@ihug.co.nz mailto:Nathan@kahuilegal.co.nz mailto:Paranihia@kahuilegal.co.nz 2017 Chief Judge’s MB 270 Introduction [1] This application filed by Rangi Bristol, Aiden Gilbert and Matiu Haitana (“the Applicants”) pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”) seeks to amend or cancel an order dated 28 April 2001 at 105 Aotea MB 127-131 determining that...

2. Ashmore v Armstrong - Te Huruhi 12B (2021) 232 Waikato Maniapoto MB 219 (232 WMN 219) [pdf, 522 KB]

   ...opportunities have come to fruition and there continues to be no substantial income from the block. [3] The majority owners of the block are the Newton whānau, who collectively hold 66.66% of the shares in it.2 On 4 March 2020, the Newton whānau filed an application to partition out their shareholding in the block, alongside associated applications. The Newton whānau say this is a practical solution to move the Trust forward. Erin Ashmore, a beneficial owner in the block, o...

3. Moeahu v Winitana - Waiwhetu Pa No 4 (2013) 310 Aotea MB 172 (310 AOT 172) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...dated 8 June 2012. The report was completed by KPMG in draft form on 6 September 2012 and circulated to the trustees for their information and comment. [11] The substantive hearing was held on 18 January 2013. 6 Mr Winitana, through counsel, filed detailed written submissions. Mr Moeahu disputed the submissions made by Mr Winitana as to the appointment of the accountants and the nomination of Amanda Garrick as a signatory for the trust account. The issue of the purchase of the...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 83 Wilson v Wilson [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...second defendant are brothers. [3] Prior to the substantive hearing, there were issues as to whether the correct defendant(s) had been cited. The plaintiff initially sought judgment against the second defendant only; ultimately the plaintiff filed and served a second amended statement of claim which cited the first defendant company, Bruce Wilson Painting & Decorating Limited, and the second defendant, Bruce Wilson t/a Wilson Painting & Decorating. Although the primary i...

5. JR v SW LCRO 91/2014 (27 March 2015) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...including the final invoiced amount, were reasonable. [12] The Committee determined, pursuant to s 138(2) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act), that no further action was necessary or appropriate. Application for Review [13] JR filed an application to review the decision of the Standards Committee on 30 April 2014. [14] They contended that the Standards Committee had failed to address the substance of their complaint, being allegation that: • Invoices were ren...

6. Kidd v Maori Owners - Whenuanui No 2B [2021] Chief Judges MB 1409 (2021 CJ 1409) [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...mailto:Don@wwandd.co.nz mailto:Coral@wwandd.co.nz mailto:Nicholai.Anderson@crownlaw.govt.nz 2021 Chief Judge’s MB 1410 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] On 1 September 2020, Richard Julian Kidd and Dianne Janet Kidd (“the applicants”) filed this application pursuant to s 45 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (“the Act”). [2] The applicants seek to cancel an order made at 113 Whangarei MB 275-276 on 28 February 2007 (“the 2007 order”). The 2007 order rel...

7. [2022] NZEmpC 183 Butt v Attorney-General [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...evidence of their concern only eight days after the Record of Settlement was signed. It was clear at that early stage what Ms Wilson had understood from her interactions with Ms McKechnie and what she had conveyed to the Butts. [95] The Butts filed the initial statement of claim in these proceedings themselves. The claim in relation to misrepresentation was made after they instructed counsel and obtained advice. I do not consider the timing to undermine their claim. [96] In an...

8. [2022] NZEmpC 167 Halse v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 331 KB]

   ...claim was that the Authority’s minute, and the seven determinations, were made “without original jurisdiction” and in breach of Mr Halse’s “right to justice”. Claims were made that the Authority had no power to deal with the proceeding filed by the Trust, because the dispute did not arise from an employment agreement or relationship, that the Authority had no power to make “non- identification” orders, or to enforce a contract between Mr Halse’s former client and t...

9. Terms & definitions

   Terms & definitions A   B   C   D   E   F   G   H   I   J   K   L   M   N   O   P   Q   R   S   T   U   V   W   X   Y   Z A Adult(s) Only people 15 years old and over were included in the NZCASS. The term ‘Adult’ refers to all NZCASS respondents. Asian This ethnicity category includes: Asian (not further defined), South-East Asian, Chinese, Indian and other Asian.

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Research & data >
   3. New Zealand Crime & Victims Survey (NZCVS) >
   4. New Zealand Crime & Safety Survey (NZCASS) >
   5. Technical information

10. [2010] NZEmpC 46 Oldco PTI Ltd v Houston [pdf, 28 KB]

    ...addition the plaintiff commenced a claim for damages in the Authority and those proceedings have now been removed to the Court and effectively consolidated with the challenge. [2] The proceedings have had a somewhat difficult passage since the filing of the challenge and the removal and a series of judgments have been issued by the Court in respect of interlocutory matters. I do not intend to re-traverse all of those proceedings. However, in a judgment dated 25 August 2008, Judge...