Search Results

Search results for Filing.

9616 items matching your search terms

  1. [2011] NZEmpC 126 EBIIWU v Norske Skog Tasman Ltd [pdf, 67 KB]

    ...Counsel: Mr L Yukich, advocate for the plaintiff Ms K Dunn, counsel for the plaintiff Judgment: 5 October 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] This chambers hearing was convened to deal with an application Mr Yukich filed on behalf of the plaintiff union seeking a direction from the Court allowing the plaintiff to produce affidavit evidence of historical bargaining over the issue of long service leave. The defendant opposed the request for leave to file fu...

  2. [2017] NZEmpC 140 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...of an application to exclude evidence AND IN THE MATTER of applications for leave to cross-examine deponents BETWEEN JOHN MATSUOKA Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 29 September and 2, 6, 11, 24, 27 and 31 October, 2 November 2017 Appearances: R Harrison QC and M O'Brien, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC and D Eriksen, counsel for defendant G Pollak, counsel for non-parties Zamb...

  3. IHC New Zealand v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access No. 2) [2014] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 51 KB]

    ...Plaintiff Ms M Coleman and Mr SJ Humphrey for First and Second Defendants DATE OF DECISION: 16 May 2014 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL GRANTING NON-PARTY ACCESS TO STATEMENT OF CLAIM AND STATEMENT OF REPLY Background [1] These proceedings were filed on 27 September 2012. For reasons set out in the Minutes dated 22 November 2012, 15 February 2013, 24 May 2013, 28 June 2013 and 4 July 2013, little progress has been made. [2] The plaintiff has since engaged a new instructing solici...

  4. [2010] NZEmpC 23 Metallic Sweeping (1998) Ltd v Whitehead [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...reserved with the parties having 28 days to make submissions if the issue could not be resolved between them. Well after the expiry of that time limit, counsel for the plaintiff (“Metallic”) (respondent in the proceedings before the Authority) filed a memorandum in support of a claim for costs. This memorandum was filed on 4 March 2009. Upon receipt of the memorandum Mr Whitehead’s solicitors advised the Authority that they no longer had instructions. [3] Follow...

  5. Waitangi Tribunal - approved recommendations for local issues research programme (LIRP) [pdf, 125 KB]

    ...operations on Māori communities since 1991, leading, where merited, to targeted research on selected local examples. 10 1.14 Supplementary listing and indexing of document banks and research information: a) the subject listing of source items, files and file groups for those source collections that lack adequate description of their contents; b) supplementary indexing by person, place, area and land block name, where feasible; and c) a DVD collection of all technical research re...

  6. Bahramitash v CAC 402 & Ritesh [2016] NZREADT 40 [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...June 2016 ___________________________________________________________________ DECISION AS TO ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE ___________________________________________________________________ [1] On 3 November 2015 the appellant, Mr Bahramitash, filed an appeal against the finding by the Complaints Assessment Committee 402 (the Committee) in its decision dated 25 August 2015, that the appellant had engaged in unsatisfactory conduct (“the 2 substantive appeal”),1 and i...

  7. [2012] NZEmpC 37 Anto v Planet Spice Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

    ...Registrar reported that he had received an enquiry from counsel for the defendant in relation to an outstanding costs decision in this matter. The Acting Registrar advised that after locating the Court file he had noted that relevant memoranda filed by counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant back in March and April 2011 had never previously been referred to a Judge for attention. The oversight, which appears to be wholly attributable to the Registry Office, is regretted. [2...

  8. Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 242 KB]

    ...to Hutt Valley Hospital. At 10.20pm that officer took two photographs of Mr Yiasoumi’s facial injuries. For this he used his Police issue iPhone. In entirely innocent circumstances those photographs were not subsequently attached to the Police file. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Yiasoumi v Attorney-General [2017] NZHRRT 12.] 2 [2] Because the Police doubted the credibility of Mr Yiasoumi’s account of the inci...

  9. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...changes made to the immigration policy meant he was not eligible for automatic selection. Ms Emberson admits the delays. [2] A further complaint against Ms Emberson by the regulatory body concerns her failure to make available the complainant’s file for inspection. As to this, she says it was her employer’s file and not hers and she had left the firm’s employment by the time inspection was sought. The issue here for the Tribunal is whether an adviser could be in breach of t...

  10. LCRO 84/2020 WF v BP (11 June 2020) [pdf, 159 KB]

    ...The Standards Committee delivered its decision on 23 March 2020. [3] Mr WF lodged his application to review the Committee’s decision on 14 May 2020. [4] The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) states that review applications must be filed within 30 working days after a copy or notice of the determination is served on, given to or otherwise brought to the attention of the applicant 2 for review.1 In the absence of proof to the contrary, service of the Committee’s dec...