Search Results

Search results for Filing.

18490 items matching your search terms

  1. Dotcom v Crown Law Office [2018] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 944 KB]

    1 (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ALL INFORMATION RELATING TO PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL CIRCUMSTANCES (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2018] NZHRRT 7 Reference No. HRRT 047/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN KIM DOTCOM Plaintiff AND CROWN LAW OFFICE First Defendant CONT. AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG...

  2. 22nd Minute of the Environment Court (dated 22 November 2018) [pdf, 34 KB]

    ...AND MAINTENANCE (ENV-2016-WLG-000058) TWENTY-SECOND MINUTE OF THE ENVIRONMENT COURT (22 NOVEMBER 2018) [1] The Court has received applications to strike-out from Guardians of the Bays and Jump Jet. [2] The Applicants for strike-out are to file a synopsis of their submissions by midday Monday 3 December 2018. [3] All other parties who wish to be heard on the applications (in support or opposition) are to file a synopsis of their submissions by midday Monday 10 December 2018. [...

  3. What happens next

    Find out the process a claim goes through from application to decision in this section. This diagram shows the process a claim goes through at the tribunal: Diagram of the process a claim goes through Read a glossary of the common terms used in the Weathertight Homes Tribunal

  4. Review of registrar's decision

    If you do not agree with the decision of a Registrar or Deputy Registrar you can apply to have that decision reviewed. To apply for a review of a decision by a registrar or deputy registrar not relating to a fee waiver application you will need to file an interlocutory application within 5 working days of receiving the decision. For more information, see rule 2.12 of the District Court Rules You will need to pay a fee. To apply for a review of a decision by a registrar or deputy registrar to dec...

  5. Media

    Media representatives, as well as any other person, are welcome to observe Employment Court hearings, which are open to the public. If you want to film, record, take photographs or use other broadcast media during a hearing, you will need to send an application to the registrar at least 10 working days before the hearing. Please fill in an application for in court media coverage. For guidance on remote viewing of a hearing please see: Guidelines for Remote Viewing of Hearings. Media representati

  6. [2014] NZEmpC 235 Rutherford Street Kindergarten v Chilton [pdf, 119 KB]

    ...follows that any grievance that your client has, which is denied, is outside the statutory 90-day period. My instructions are that my client does not consent to the grievance being raised out of time. [27] Mr Robson, in an affidavit which he filed in the Authority proceeding, stated that the personal grievance letter had been sent within 90 days of Ms Chilton’s dismissal. Accordingly, the “three-year rule” in s 114(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) was in pl...

  7. CAC 20004 v Kolich & Anor [2014] NZREADT 66 [pdf, 124 KB]

    ...the cheque for the commission been paid to his agency but rather to Mr Vithal directly. Mr Vithal works as a licensed salesperson for ReMax, Wellington. Mr Vithal telephoned Mr Robinson in response to the letter he received, and Mr Robinson made a file note of this conversation. In this file note he records that Mr Vithal had said that: “Ivan wanted to do a private deal, wanted a backhander done, 50% a fee for it but hasn’t actually paid him yet. He said he not had any money ye...

  8. [2017] NZEnvC 199 Toomey v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 552 KB]

    ...important that the assessment of whether any amendment was reasonably and fairly raised in the course of submissions, should be approached in a realistic workable fashion rather than from the perspective of legal nicety. [15] Counsel for TCDC initially filed submissions treating the submissions by the Toomeys as being of the same scope as that of Mr Nathan. Counsel then filed amended submissions with an explanatory memorandum acknowledging that the because the Toomey submissions did n...

  9. AG v ZQ LCRO 204/2011 (14 February 2014) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...information prior to the matter going to the Committee, and also that he had asked for a meeting which had not occurred. In his view the complaint should not have been dismissed without his further information having been provided. He wrote, “All files were in [the] Complaint[s] office but no one would take time to read them.”2 He wanted an opportunity to present his material and have a meeting to discuss the complaint. Considerations The reasons for the Standards Committee...