18490 items matching your search terms
...challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN YOUNG GOO KANG Plaintiff AND KYOUNG YONG LEE Defendant EMPC 278/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN YOUNG GOO KANG Applicant AND KYOUNG YONG LEE Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Kang, counsel for...
...Waitangi Tribunal will carry out all of its scheduled work and return to normal operation. 3. The use of remote participation will remain available for use in appropriate cases, to be determined by Presiding Officers on a case-by-case basis. Filing and Fees 4. Filing of applications and other Tribunal documents may be made either in person at the Tribunal counter or electronically at Level 1. Hygiene 5. If an applicant, respondent, counsel or any other persons required or...
[2024] NZPSPLA 039 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against MURRAY HALE DECISION [1] Police filed a late objection to Murray Hale’s application for a certificate of approval. They consider Mr Hale is not suitable to be a certificate holder because he is the president of his local chapter of the Highway 61 Motorcycle Cub [2] As the objection was filed after Mr Hale’s appl...
Almost every document you file in the District Court must be served or given to the other party in the proceeding. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to serve their documents on the defendant, and the defendant’s responsibility to serve their documents on the plaintiff. This includes information about when and where a hearing or conference will take place. Documents that begin a proceeding (such as the statement of claim, notice of proceeding and list of documents, or an originating applic...
...Counsel undertook to have further discussions with their clients during the luncheon adjournment. When the Court resumed Mr Ponniah completed his cross- examination of Mrs Kirkley. A timetable was then agreed to allow for further evidence, the filing of closing submissions, and the date when the hearing would resume. No further evidence was presented. Mr Ponniah filed his closing submissions on 2 June. On 8 June Mr Brant advised the Court that the plaintiff would not be filing a...
...Agreement 1 Regulation 7 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Disciplinary Tribunal) Regulations 2008. 2 The specific detail of the amendments is set out in the revised charge document dated 25 October 2013 filed with the Tribunal. 4 by signing it, but had signed the Agreement to confirm that he had provided independent legal advice about the Agreement and its implications. [12] The original misconduct charge had noted in th...
...WT’s professional practices, it is relevant to his conduct in signing the invoice that is the subject of this review. under the Law Practitioners Act 1982 (LPA), which applied at the time of the conduct in 2006. As no review application has been filed in respect of that decision, it cannot now be challenged as part of this review. [8] Mr WT’s conduct in signing the invoice, and his explanation for it, were identical to his conduct and explanation in respect of the affidavit....
...10 townhouses. In 2008, weathertightness issues with each of the townhouses became apparent. [7] The body corporate instructed [Law Firm A] to act in a claim it wished to bring against the local Council and Mr S assumed responsibility for the file (the weathertight claim). [8] Mr PP and Mr S exchanged emails during May 2011 about legal fees. Mr PP asked Mr S for “a firm quote”. In his email to Mr PP, dated 23 May 2011, Mr S said the following: To the conclusion of the dis...
...threatening letters”, Mr ND, in his 29 September letter to Mr OE had explained that [ABJ]’s objection to [Mr [OE]] acting as mediator was not intended as “a threat or threats”. Application for review [20] In its application for review filed on 31 August 2020, [KLM] says it “fail[s] to accept that one has the right to threaten any individual”, and from the commencement of the lease, [KLM] had been subjected by [ABJ] to “th[at] type of behaviour”, namely, “threats,...
...which was diagnosed as “Sprain, shoulder joint – side right”. [5] On 10 October 2016 Mr O’Brian suffered another injury when he fell into the cockpit of a yacht under repair. He hurt his back, neck and shoulder. An ACC injury claim was filed for a neck and thoracic injury following a visit to a chiropractor. ACC accepted cover for the injury on 4 November 2016. Mr O’Brian then received treatment from his chiropractor. Mr O’Brian saw his GP on 20 May 2017 who made...