Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 187 AG New Zealand Limited v Boulger no 2 interlocutory [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...not need to be determined at this stage. [2] Following discussion at a telephone conference on 16 October 2015, counsel were invited to confer about the form of further orders to bring the process to a conclusion. A joint memorandum has been filed setting out a number of draft orders. [3] The following orders are accordingly made: (a) The plaintiff’s IT advisor, PwC, will: (i) Remove the hard drive from the defendant’s Apple MacIntosh computer currently held b...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 63 Pact Group v Service and Food Workers’ Union Nga Ringa Tota Inc [pdf, 37 KB]

   ...AND SERVICE AND FOOD WORKERS' UNION NGA RINGA TOTA INCORPORATED First Defendant AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PUKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI INCORPORATED Second Defendant Hearing: On the papers and by memorandum filed on 12 April 2013 Appearances: Barry Dorking, counsel for plaintiff Peter Cranney, counsel for first defendant Catherine MacNamara, counsel for second defendant Judgment: 15 April 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE G

3. [2013] NZEmpC 186 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...conference call on 8 October 2013 (Heard at Wellington) Counsel: Scott Worthy, counsel for plaintiff Anjela Sharma, counsel for defendant Judgment: 8 October 2013 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS [1] The plaintiff has filed a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). 1 This morning it applied for a stay of proceedings pending determination of the challenge, and sought additional orders relating to urgency...

4. [2014] NZEmpC 105 Austin v Yoobee Ltd [pdf, 51 KB]

   BENJAMIN JOHN AUSTIN v YOOBEE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 105 [20 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 105 ARC 32/14 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN BENJAMIN JOHN AUSTIN Applicant AND YOOBEE LIMITED Respondent Hearing: By written submissions filed on 12 May and 12 and 19 June 2014 Appearances: Applicant in person T Clarke and E Coats, co...

5. Potaka v Hutt Valley DHB [2012] NZHRRT 14 [pdf, 36 KB]

   ...Scott, Member Ms M Sinclair, Member COUNSEL: Mr JW Howell for Plaintiff Ms I Reuvecamp for Defendant DATE OF DECISION: 28 May 2012 NON-DISCLOSURE ORDER Background [1] Briefs of evidence in these proceedings have not yet been filed but the general background circumstances adequately emerge from the current pleadings, being the second amended statement of claim dated 4 May 2012 and the second amended statement of reply dated 11 May 2012. Further reference can be made...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 12 Hall v Dionex Pty Limited oral interlocutory [pdf, 41 KB]

   ...of a meeting that occurred on 21 December 2011. While it is apparent that notices requiring disclosure had been served by each party, the plaintiff had not disclosed the existence of the audio and the transcription of it. [2] An affidavit was filed on 7 February 2014 explaining why the audio had only recently been retrieved and transcribed. Mr Erickson, on behalf of the defendant, opposes the transcript being admitted in evidence and has submitted in summary that the plaintiff f...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 167 3rd Fairway Developments Limited [pdf, 1024 KB]

   ...Limited is ordered, by consent, to: (i) pay costs of $15,764.66 (including GST) to the Environment Court; and (ii) pay costs of $31 ,225.65 (including GST) to the Auckland Council. 2 REASONS Introduction [1] On 25 January 2017 the applicant filed an application for direct referral seeking resource consents for a 31 Lot residential subdivision and associated works at 84 Laurel Oak Drive, Albany. [2] The Court issued decision [2017] NZEnvC 127 on 17 August 2017, granting the

8. Health services and outcomes inquiry media release [pdf, 578 KB]

   ...discuss issues such as scope, eligibility, and how claims might be heard. The parties and the Crown have been directed to hold roundtable discussions over the next three months to further refine the scope, priorities and process for the inquiry and file bibliographies of available research. The Crown have also been directed to file any Māori health documentation held by the Ministry for Health (see Wai 2575 #2.5.8). A process of determining eligibility will need to take place. The Tribu...

9. Wilson v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACA 04-2016 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...declined on 3 July 2009. A review was sought. A hearing was scheduled but neither Mr Wilson nor his former lawyer attended. No reasons were given for their non-attendance. The review was dismissed on 10 February 2010. [3] An appeal was filed in the District Court on about 14 March 2010 against the review decision of 10 February. Memoranda were then filed in the District Court by the lawyers for the parties in November 2015 seeking a direction that the Authority has jurisdic...

10. National Standards Committee 2 v Harker [2020] NZLCDT 37 [pdf, 70 KB]

    ...therapy in accordance with undertaking 3, the final report advising whether the two year period of therapy has been completed in terms of undertaking 3 (it shall not be necessary for the psychologist to describe the therapy undertaken). 5. Upon the filing of the final report of the psychologist under undertaking 4, I will be automatically discharged from the undertaking. Solemnly undertaken this 30th day of September 2020. Richard Thomas Harker [3] The Tribunal s 257 costs certi...