Search Results

1. Andrews v Commissioner of Police [2013] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...he got older, the sentences he received got longer. Nevertheless the relationship with Ms Edmonds continued with her visiting him in prison every week. He acknowledges that at times she has been unhappy with him for “coming and going” as he pleased and for not being in employment. She has also on occasion provided information to the Police about his criminal activities. Nevertheless they have always made up. He believes they have strong feelings for each other. He concedes that h...

2. Nicholls v Nicholls - Koromatua 3A (2017) 154 Waikato-Maniapoto MB 128 (154 WMN 128) [pdf, 418 KB]

   ...be appropriate. Respondent’s submissions [20] Mr Kahukiwa acted for respondents George Nicholls, Cherie Povey and Arohaina Povey. They opposed the orders sought for recovery of rental income, mesne profits and interest on the basis that the plea before the Court is misconceived. [21] Mr Kahukiwa noted that while the Court granted orders in favour of the applicants restraining the respondents from going onto the lands and allowing recovery of the land, the Court did not make a...

3. Cooper v Standards Committee LCRO 280/2013, 281/2013, 324/2013, 325/2013, 34/2014, 118/2014 (17 April 2015) [pdf, 406 KB]

   ...6700) [3] A complaint was laid by Mr AQ raising concerns about Mr Cooper having repeatedly sought adjournments, and failed to attend Court to represent him on a defended drink-driving charge. After several months’ delay, Mr AQ entered a guilty plea and was sentenced, in Mr Cooper’s absence. Mr AQ objected to having paid Mr Cooper $7,000 for services Mr Cooper did not provide. Mr Cooper refunded the $7,000, and Mr AQ withdrew his complaint. Standards Committee Decisions 1...

4. LCRO 148/2020 PV v GY (31 May 2021) [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...to police as per VA but Sgt OW considers RS only confessed because he thought he’d killed CB. Told CB to email her views to police and cc me in if she wants to and only if she wants to. [14] Mr RS appeared in court on 27 May 2019 to enter his plea to the assault charge. A not guilty plea was entered and the matter was remanded for a case review hearing on [date] 2019. [15] On [date] 2019, Mr RS was sentenced to home detention following conviction on his driving charges. Ms PV was...

5. COURTS126-Lets-talk-court-booklet-2019-Print.pdf [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...are not the person who is on trial and you can’t go to prison. You’re only there to help tell the judge/jury what happened. Will I always have to go to court if I am a witness? No. If the defendant agrees that they have committed the offence (pleads guilty), you will not have to go to court. You also won’t have to go to court if it’s agreed that your written statement, video, or ‘brief of evidence’ (a document that contains the Our society has laws (rules) that say what p...

6. Legal Aid Fee Glossary

   ...grantThis fee can be claimed each time a single charge or set of charges are added to the grant.This is a repeatable activity and can be claimed per occurrence.  If a set of charges are added, the fee cannot be claimed for each individual charge.Please note that the fee cannot be claimed unless additional charges have been added to the grant by Legal Aid Services. Schedules A-F Charge Discussions N/A Charge DiscussionsThis fee can be claimed for engaging in charge discussions with the...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. Lawyers & service providers >
   3. Legal aid lawyers >
   4. Legal aid provider resources >
   5. Criminal fixed fee finder

7. Reoffending analysis for restorative justice cases 2008 to 2011 [pdf, 651 KB]

   ...study compared 2,323 conferenced offenders with 6,718 matched offenders. 3 Offenders in the study included those who:  had been charged with an imprisonable offence involving a victim  were aged 17 or over  entered a guilty plea  did not receive a custodial sentence,1 and  were charged in a district court from which referrals were received by restorative justice providers included in the study. The measures of reoffending used in this study were frequ...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 75 Talbot v NZ Airline Pilots Association Industrial Union of Workers Inc [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...is neither at risk of sanction nor otherwise prejudiced. Whilst that is strictly correct, I do not consider that it would be just to dismiss the challenge out of hand and otherwise than on its merits for the following reasons. [4] That is a plea that was apparently advanced by the Union before the Employment Relations Authority but was rejected by it, albeit without written reasons. It is not difficult to understand why the Union might be keen to have its Rules interpreted and c...

9. McGregor v Hutcheson - Porongahau 1B4'O'2 Trust (2015) 43 Tākitimu MB 15 (43 TKT 15) [pdf, 326 KB]

   ...of the trustee’s performance was essential when applying s 240. [19] I adopt the approach set out in Rameka and Apatu. Discussion [20] As foreshadowed on 16 December 2010 Judge Davis issued sentencing notes following Mr Hutcheson guilty pleas to two charges of receiving the sum of $15,243.75 (total of $30,487.50) in terms that he knew required him to account to the Mangamaire B2 Trust. The funds were properly payable to the Mangamaire B2 Trust but as foreshadowed they were...

10. Restorative Justice: Reoffending Analysis for cases 2008 - 2011 [pdf, 651 KB]

    ...study compared 2,323 conferenced offenders with 6,718 matched offenders. 3 Offenders in the study included those who:  had been charged with an imprisonable offence involving a victim  were aged 17 or over  entered a guilty plea  did not receive a custodial sentence,1 and  were charged in a district court from which referrals were received by restorative justice providers included in the study. The measures of reoffending used in this study were frequ...